What opinion just makes you look like you aged 30 years

    • sanpedropeddler@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      I doubt you’ll find anyone here that disagrees with you. I was going to get an older pixel but I got a 6 instead and I’m still grieving the loss of my headphone jack.

        • OptimsticDolphin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          But then you can’t charge at the same time, no good if you want to plug your phone into some speakers and charge it at the same time

            • dwindling7373@feddit.it
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              My take: cables are a sustainable, effective and ELEGANT solution. Most wireless solutions fall under the definition of over-engineering.

              Cable: a properly lengthened cheap rope that magically transfers information, power and anchor stuff together.

              Wireless: two antenna, encoding of all kind, radiations, BATTERIES, higher chance to lose stuff, degrading of quality (Bluetooth).

  • Npenplz@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    1 year ago

    Smart tech in general is annoying and dumb. I want my TV to just be a tv with inputs, I don’t need built in firmware and updates to shove ads in my face. I don’t want my car to have a touch screen to adjust the A/C, just give me a knob or buttons.

  • The Baldness@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m not subscribing to anything. If I buy something, it’s fully functional, and it’s mine. There is no ongoing relationship between me and the manufacturer. Done.

    • CalcProgrammer1@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      The only thing I’m willing to pay a subscription for are the essentials that have no product alternative, i.e. utilities - power, water, Internet. I refuse to pay for streaming when they used to sell DVDs and CDs with the same content. I refuse to pay for game subscription services when you used to be able to buy the games outright. I refuse to pay for software-as-a-service or bullshit like cloud service integrations for smart home stuff. If I don’t own it, I don’t buy it.

      • Swintoodles@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        At least for utilities you can reframe it as paying for parcels of utility, and then consuming them, like you do for food. Middleman bullshit like cloud services that refuse to let you just self-host can screw off. Having to spend money to spend extra resources to deal with a 3rd party is obnoxious, doubly so when they just decide they don’t want to support it anymore and pull the plug.

    • RagingNerdoholic@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Anything that doesn’t incur an ongoing cost to provide should be legally prohibited from being sold as a “subscription.”

        • RagingNerdoholic@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Except more and more companies are hopping on this gravy train because they can get away with it. At some point (and that point may be now already, depending on the sector), it’s going to be difficult-to-impossible to buy anything without this subscription bullshit.

          • The Baldness@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            We’ll find a way. Right now, I’m mostly concerned about cars. That’s going to be an interesting problem over the next few years.

    • Mackie@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m working on this, the subscription model has gotten so expensive now that literally everything uses it. Do you have any tips besides “just pirate everything”?

        • qprimed@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          you know, I (supposedly - you cant prove anything, mr. prosecutor) may have done this as a kid. then I hopped hardcore on to the FLOSS bandwagon and never looked back. everything I need I can find as a FLOSS package (firmware often excluded, of course). all the learning that I (supposedly) did through the “hack” as a kid now goes into writing original code and supporting open source software. FLOSS literally (may have) made an honest man out of me :-)

      • Stumblinbear@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Unfortunately the only alternative for some things are becoming very tech literate and running an objectively worse mediocre open source software

      • SaltyIceteaMaker@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Use free or at least alternatives without a subscription model where possible

        For cars? Just buy one that’s a bit older

        Movies etc? Pirate

        • The Baldness@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’ve wanted an EV for years, but I’m sticking with my very old and fuel-efficient ICE car until it’s absolutely dead. At that point, I’m hoping that some model of EV emerges as the most hackable one, like the Nissan Leaf. I’ll buy a very used one of those & hack it.

  • LinkOpensChest.wav@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    1 year ago

    Algorithms that try to suggest me content are universally bad, and all searches should provide results based solely on the terms, syntax, and language entered. Same with anything that tries to provide me content based on data harvested about my location or demographic.

    • amanneedsamaid@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      All the content on my feed should come from unpersonalized suggestions, or the communities i choose to follow. 👍

    • Leigh@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      I like that Lemmy and Masto don’t have those fucking algorithms. It’s a relief.

      • StoicLime@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        What is your opinion on Bluesky? Their default feed is chronological, but they do have algorithms. They’re actually moving towards custom algorithms, so you can build your own or use someone else’s, delete, pin, reorder them. It’s like different feeds. I like that implementation personally.

        • Leigh@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I couldn’t say, they’re closed to new users. I’ve been on the wait list for a long time, but no joy.

          I’m skeptical that it ultimately won’t just turn into Twitter 2.0

          • StoicLime@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Actually, the waitlist takes way too much time. I just went on Twitter and found a couple of people with invites. I don’t have one yet, but would you want one when I do?

            • Leigh@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Sure, I’ll give it a go, thank you for thinking of me. The whole bullshit with Twitter and now Reddit has me feeling pretty burned on corporate-owned social media, so I’m likely to stick with federated things like Masto, Lemmy, etc., but I’ll give it a go. I am curious about it. I wonder why they’re leaning so hard on the waitlist thing? They’re losing precious adoption time, as people are right now wanting to move away from Twitter. Or rather, they have been wanting that for months, so there may already be a lot of lost opportunity re: user attention or interest.

    • sanpedropeddler@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think it has its place but it should absolutely be optional. Yeah they suck but the YouTube algorithm is responsible for like 70% of my knowledge base.

      • LinkOpensChest.wav@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I miss accidentally finding the most random stuff on YouTube way back before they started pushing monetized content, but it’s been a very long time

      • StoicLime@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I feel like algorithms when done well are amazing. Like, the YouTube Music algorithm is so great for music, I just start playing a song and it takes it from there. Unlike Spotify, which has gone downhill these days, I never feel the need to skip a song on YTM.

    • Akasazh@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I used to be mad at algorythms suggesting things that is disliked. But then I realised that it would be rather scary if they were right.

    • TauZero@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Never have I ever benefited from Google or Amazon or anyone changing my search string for me. Even if I do misspell something, I’m gonna click on the “did you mean x instead?” link myself, because I don’t trust the 50/50 mixed results anyway. But 90% of the time I’m gonna be immediately scrambling to put the double quotes back in, which it’s also gonna ignore half the time.

      • LinkOpensChest.wav@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Hard agree. Sometimes I’m searching for something very specific and esoteric, and the results spam me with unrelated nonsense because the search engine thinks it knows better than I do

    • dogmuffins@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Some alternative frontends resolve this. Invidious for example is a youtube front end. There are public instances. Most popular sites have them.

      • LinkOpensChest.wav@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yes! I’ve started using Invidious more and more when I’m on PC, but there are also addons that make YouTube itself more tolerable.

        I’ve been using LibreTube on my Android phone, and it’s so much better.

        • dogmuffins@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah.

          Invidious is pretty good in android Firefox like when you “add to homescreen”. The other browser add-ons won’t avoid the algorithm I think?

          I use newpipe. I found libretube seemed to stop working more than newpipe but maybe time for another look!

          • LinkOpensChest.wav@lemmy.one
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            I was actually using newpipe + sponsorblock before switching to Libretube. There’s only been once that I’ve had to manually switch the piped instance so far, but I just prefer Libretube’s UI. Newpipe worked great, too. Both very good apps. You can’t go wrong with either imo

  • 1337@1337lemmy.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Sneaker culture is incredibly weird. Shoes made by children in China with a limited edition color are in such high demand that there are sites where people refresh F5 constantly hoping to have the honor to pay hundreds and hundreds for shoes that cost $7.50 to make. Then half of the time people won’t even wear them outside, they’ll put them in a bag and change shoes when they get to work or whatever. Or some might not even wear the shoes at all and just display them.

    I’m an old soul in this sense. I love a quality goodyear welted shoe, and made in USA, UK, or Italy usually. An Allen Edmonds strandmok is a fantastic everyday shoe for me. I like to purchase nice things in general, use them, take care of them. I really hate throwaway culture as well.

    Please nobody hate me for this, I’m a bit self conscious being an admin of my own instance and don’t want to piss people off haha. If you’re into gym shoe culture that’s awesome. If I knew you in real life I’d probably make fun of you for a minute if I saw you walking outside in socks carrying your $400 limited edition sneakers, but then you can make fun of me for one of the thousands of things I do and it’s all in good fun.

    • averagedrunk@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t think you’re alone in that. I don’t even think it’s a thing that makes you sound older. That’s a niche hobby that some folks have like collecting miniatures.

      • InfiniWheel@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I unserstand miniature collectors more than sneakerheads. There are only so many variations of sneakers but almost infinite miniatures of whatever

  • neo (he/him)A
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    1 year ago

    Things should be made to last and not be made to intentionally break after a short time.

      • Mr_Grumpy@lemmy.fmhy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        Many of the younger generations seem to accept that things don’t last/break easily. I come from a time where there was a wiring diagram for the TV pasted on the inside back cover. Washing machines and other devices often had the schematics included. Repairing your stuff and keeping it running was the norm back then. Even if you couldn’t, you probably had a neighbour who could. Planned obsolescence is a relatively new thing.

        • plactagonic@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Planned obsolescence was first introduced for lightbulb, according to Veritasium video on YT. But for most things it is relatively new thing (20 years).

      • emerty@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Things used to be made like this. Only boomers are old enough to remember buying an iron for life.

    • pumpsnabben@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      You can still buy things with very long lifetime but they are very expensive, the results of making cheaper things that break earlier is that more people can afford to buy them.

      This is of course what most companies want but is also makes a lot of products available to people who couldn’t afford them earlier which for many is a good thing.

      I think it’s a fair trade.

  • olsonexi@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    1 year ago

    The trend towards ever thinner and lighter devices is stupid. I would much rather have a thicker laptop if it means I get ethernet, multiple usb-A ports, full-size hdmi/displayport, an sdcard reader, and an optical drive, than something that’s ultra thin and sleek but only has a couple usb-C ports and requires a million dongles.

    • Tobi@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Why do laptops need to be thin anyway? I kinda understand it for phones because they need to fit in tight pockets, but even then they were thin enough years ago we don’t need to lose features to make them thinner

      • fuck reddit@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        I just bought a gaming laptop to replace my business laptop. Gaming laptops are generally better at everything. The hardest part was finding one I could have in meetings that didn’t scream it was a gaming laptop. Sometimes I like to play SimCity while I’m sitting in meetings.

        • 6pick6el6@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          What laptop did ya get? My supervisor is thinking about getting us some nicer laptops for work and we tossed around the idea of a gaming one but I argued against alienware

          • fuck reddit@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I ended up with the HP Victus because it was on sale for $499. I added the maximum RAM and spent half a day doing bios and other updates, because the poor thing was shipped with glitchy software and bios. After the updates and RAM upgrades, she’s been a joy. No reboots, no blue screens, and I can play Skyrim while I’m in a Skype meeting

        • averagedrunk@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          I think giving a presentation on the Graphics Crusher 3000 with an RGB backlit keyboard would be very impactful.

        • neo (he/him)A
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I have an IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IHU6 from Lenovo and you wouldn’t know it was a gaming laptop just by looking at it from the outside.

      • Kouran94@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I guess it depends on what you want it for. I have to travel and take my work laptop with me everywhere, so I certainly appreciate a smaller, thinner and lighter device.

    • t0fr@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I agree with the sentiment, but this feels like the least boomer opinion ngl

      • JillyB@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I think it’s simultaneously an opinion held by very old people who remember when they could just walk to the store and younger urbanists that want us to return to that. The people in the middle grew up in a car oriented society that hadn’t completely lost small businesses and been locked down by traffic. And they now have a house way out in the burbs with a disdain for the traffic of the city. Urbanism threatens their way of life now. That’s my opinion.

        • 𝒍𝒆𝒎𝒂𝒏𝒏@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Most of the US has dug a hole that can’t easily be fixed with its car-centric developments, people living there pretty much need a car for everything.

          Driving there may be a pleasure, but I personally wouldn’t want to live in that situation at all. I’m glad and lucky to have the equivalent of a mall just a 10 minute bike ride away, 25 minute walk, 5 minute bus trip.

          • JillyB@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            America is definitely pretty deeply invested in car-centeic living. But I don’t think it’s impossible to get out of it. There’s rising pressure to lower housing costs, traffic, and improve infrastructure quality. My city (which is about as car centric as it gets) is growing fast and most of that is with infil development. It’s going to be a slow transformation but I think it will happen. I don’t think American cities will look like European or Asian cities because they won’t evolve the same way. But they will look different to how they look now.

            • 𝒍𝒆𝒎𝒂𝒏𝒏@lemmy.one
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Yep I agree - It’s definitely possible for the US to shift away from it, some cities have even been transforming some of their busy central roads into pedestrianised boulevards (such as times square in NY, and a couple others I can’t remember off the top of my head) and from an outsiders perspective been successful.

              The difficulty is mainly going to be places like Culver City where some just don’t get that cars don’t scale well in dense urban areas like cities - they’ve voted to remove a 2 year old bike lane just to get back an additional driving lane. That’s just going to move most of the bike riders back into their cars, filling that brand new driving lane (and the other existing driving lanes) with traffic that previously didn’t exist. Hopefully over time positive changes will return though!

    • Lobstronomosity@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Depends on the city. In my city, you could walk across the whole thing in maybe an hour, and anything major the furthest you would have to walk is about 30 minutes.

  • Shrek@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    1 year ago

    Music in restaurants and bars is just too loud. I know why the music is loud, but I am still going to shake my fist at it like Grandpa Simpson.

  • quellik@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I hate QR code menus, just let me see the damn food options without squinting at my phone

    • LemmyAtem@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t mind the ones that take me to the official website and an optimized UX, but the ones that just download a shitty pdf to my phone are garbage

    • orbit@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah I hate this and usually the menu is just a huge PDF you have to zoom in on and move around.

      • CedarMadness@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t mind the qr menus sometimes but this drives me insane. Plus the prices will be right aligned, so you have to pan back and forth to figure out how much something costs. It’s just pure laziness.

        Also, menus linked on the restaurant website where they’ve obviously uploaded the menu 3 years ago and never bothered to update it.

        • orbit@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Just reading all of this triggered me lol Super true and annoying. Business owners like it cause they don’t have to worry about printing or cleaning menus anymore but the experience is awful

      • setsneedtofeed@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        There is a place near me with great food, but their webpage menu is a scan of multiple pages of their menu set up in a slide show that will automatically rotate through the pages every ten seconds or so, and there is no way to stop it except to keep your thumb on the current page and kind of wiggle it. And if you want to scroll to a different page of the menu you can’t just flip through the pages, you have to wait at least 5 seconds before attempting to scroll but if you wait too long your scroll input and the auto scroll both happen and the menu has jumped past what you want to look at and by the way you can’t scroll backwards, only forwards so you have to make a full loop.

        AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

        • elrac@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          There are some fast food places that do that on the screens that replaced their “behind the counter” menu. Worse, sometimes they will switch between two menus and an ad. I need to look at what I’m ordering so I remember to order it right.

      • FlanFlinger@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        And the trend towards capacitive buttons in place of switches, burying things in multiple menus is a real pain for those that wear glasses only for reading.