nLuLukna @lemmy.one to Asklemmy@lemmy.ml · 1 year agoWhat is your boomer opinionmessage-squaremessage-square382fedilinkarrow-up173arrow-down16file-text
arrow-up167arrow-down1message-squareWhat is your boomer opinionnLuLukna @lemmy.one to Asklemmy@lemmy.ml · 1 year agomessage-square382fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareSapphicSandwich@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoAt least we can get USB-C headphones and use the charging port as a headphone jack.
minus-squareOptimsticDolphin@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·1 year agoBut then you can’t charge at the same time, no good if you want to plug your phone into some speakers and charge it at the same time
minus-squaredwindling7373@feddit.itlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·edit-21 year agoMy take: cables are a sustainable, effective and ELEGANT solution. Most wireless solutions fall under the definition of over-engineering. Cable: a properly lengthened cheap rope that magically transfers information, power and anchor stuff together. Wireless: two antenna, encoding of all kind, radiations, BATTERIES, higher chance to lose stuff, degrading of quality (Bluetooth).
minus-squareOptimsticDolphin@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·1 year agoInefficient, over priced, less reliable
At least we can get USB-C headphones and use the charging port as a headphone jack.
But then you can’t charge at the same time, no good if you want to plug your phone into some speakers and charge it at the same time
Wireless charging?
My take: cables are a sustainable, effective and ELEGANT solution. Most wireless solutions fall under the definition of over-engineering.
Cable: a properly lengthened cheap rope that magically transfers information, power and anchor stuff together.
Wireless: two antenna, encoding of all kind, radiations, BATTERIES, higher chance to lose stuff, degrading of quality (Bluetooth).
Inefficient, over priced, less reliable