• ALERT@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Here in Ukraine we got 1000 mbit even in small villages via optic. For 7.5$/month. For the last 10 years at least. Before that the standard was 100 mbit ethernet. 20 years ago the standard was 30 mbit via coaxial tv cable.

    • mrbiiggy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      If only it were easy to do. Technical limitations on copper is what causes low upload speeds. ISP’s prioritize the download speed, which is what people utilize the most. As fiber continues to be rolled out it should get better though.

      • exi@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Tell that to our beautiful German Telekom who’ll sell you 1000down/200up FTTH for ridiculous 80€/month.

      • jasondj@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        In the old world of the internet, people didn’t upload much anyway.

        Nobody worked from home. Nobody had their phones constantly syncing photos and videos to 1 (or often more) clouds. And even then, the photos and videos that you could take digitally were very low resolution and not very large files. Game consoles weren’t online by default until Xbox Gen 1 (and as an add on for GC and PS2) and PC gamers were a minority (and rarely direct peer-to-peer).

        That has changed, and nobody forced ISPs to keep up. In a lot of markets, the Cable ISP is a monopoly and they don’t have to do shit about it.

      • heluecht@pirati.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        @dingus @worfamerryman On DSL you have a limited set of frequencies that you can use for either upload or download. So you have to split these frequencies between upload and download. Also the DSL speed is highly depending on the length of the copper between your home and the switch cabinet on the street. (Just remember: DSL is the transmission of high frequencies over unshielded cables that never meant to transmit high frequencies) So the longer the cable, the lower the total possible bandwidth. And most people have a demand for a higher download than upload. So most people will prefer some 16 down, 2 up instead of 8 down and 8 up.

      • bric@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Just to prioritize download in limited bandwidth cables. Like a neighborhood might get 2Gbps total, but instead of doing 1 down 1 up they instead do 1.8 down and .2 up, then split that amongst a bunch of houses.

      • pli5k3n@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Because they can. Most people’s typical usage isn’t impacted by low uplink bandwidth. Very few people are uploading 4K content or live streaming or hosting a high traffic webserver from their garage. Less bandwidth means less expense, thus more profit. Capitalism, baby.

  • Motavader@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Quick! Give the ISPs a bunch of federal dollars to build out their networks so they can quietly pocket it and do stock buybacks!

    • CallumWells@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Why weren’t those monetary subsidies just after the fact instead of just paying out on promises? “You’ll get x billion dollars when y% of this area has access to z Mbps.” But then again I’ve heard there’s monopolies for that in the USA, instead of actual competition.

    • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Biden finally recently got the FCC back to protecting people, and not the damn phone and cable companies. Thank god.

      Still a lot of mess to clean up though.

  • red@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Dude, 100Mbps isn’t good enough anymore either

      • McBinary@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think person* is the keyword here. Many families have several people concurrently watching streaming video, listening to music, and playing games that are required to have an internet connection. 100Mbps is not enough.

        • wsweg@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Right, but this is about setting a minimum standard for it to be classified as broadband. For an average individual 100Mbps is high speed internet.

        • morrowind@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          No way, that would be 6.25 MB/s for tv. For a two hour movie that would be 50GB. Is a 4k movie really 50GB?

          • Saik0@lemmy.saik0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Is a 4k movie really 50GB?

            I have a number of movies (about 100-ish titles) in my library that are well above 50Mbps.

            Back to the future (1989) as an example is 72.24 GB in my library.

          • Atemu@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Depends on the quality. YouTube 4k is about 25mbit/s, so that’s 3-4 4k YouTube videos playing at the same time on a 100Mb/s connection.

            4k Blu-Rays OTOH can be about 50GB or larger even. You wouldn’t ordinarily stream that but you could stream one or two blu-rays with a 100Mb/s connection.

            100Mbit/s is plenty for current use-cases.

    • 001100 010010@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Meh, it’s good enough to be usable. I have 50/10 Mbps down/up and I can watch 1440p videos just fine. What do y’all use your internet for? Do you have like 5 family members watching stuff at the same time?

      But yea these greedy corporations aint gonna change anything unless we get laws passed and actually enforce them.

      Edit: spelling

      • fades@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        50/10

        good enough to be usable

        On a post about how ISPs are literally fucking us all over, overcharging for the most basic connections that are far behind other countries and all you have to say is iT’s UsAbLe lmao

        Youre advocating for the SLOWEST avg speed in the nation

        Americans are getting nearly 200 Mbps in download speed, but are you?

        https://www.allconnect.com/blog/us-internet-speeds-globally

        As of May 2023, Ookla’s Speedtest.net shows Americans are getting over 200 Mbps of download speed and about 23 Mbps of upload speed through their fixed broadband connections — good for 6th in the world for median fixed broadband speeds. Considering “fast internet speeds” are generally defined as any download speed above 100 Mbps, Americans are doing quite well by this measure.

        In fact, according to a recent Allconnect data report, 9 in 10 households can access at least 100 Mbps speeds.

        That’s an incredible improvement from just under a decade ago when the U.S. had an average download speed of just 31 Mbps. In 2013, America ranked 25th among 39 nations for broadband speed.

        Sub-100 is not good enough by most standards these days around the world. 50 is not even double the fastest speeds from TEN years ago

        We as consumers and citizens deserve better, especially as working from home continues to be a popular and realistic option and our global culture continues to be directly tied to internet culture/media/content.

        • PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Honestly, I would rather have universal health care than faster download speeds any day.

          I’m currently shelling out about $18,000 a year to have a $2,500 deductible.

  • SmoothLiquidation@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Since it takes so long to change the “standard” it should be set to 1-2GB per second or have it set to increase by 10-20% per year or something.

  • 56!@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    5-10 down does just fine for streaming and video calls from my experience. My ISP is badly configured, so I get like 15-20 up.