In Facebook, where I’m following family members and news sites, is where I’d want chronological feed the most. I don’t want the “best” of my family’s posts from one week ago.
In Facebook, where I’m following family members and news sites, is where I’d want chronological feed the most. I don’t want the “best” of my family’s posts from one week ago.
“Who knew DNA could be so blurry”
Many american states are right now making laws to persecute LGBT people and women who have abortions, and anyone believes associating personal ID to every post is a good idea?
The kind of stuff people try to push in name of “protecting the children” is wild.
Many american states are right now making laws to persecute LGBT people and women who have abortions, and anyone believes associating personal ID to every post is a good idea?
The kind of stuff people try to push in name of “protecting the children” is wild.
Seems to me that these threads keep coming up and rising up because people want to talk about them.
The better solution reddit had was to let posts be sorted by tags so that people who don’t want to see a certain topic can turn it off, rather than that decision being made for everyone else.
It would be good if the change was towards Linux, but it seems more likely the transition will be towards an increasingly restrictive Android, reflecting how phones have become people’s primary computing devices, so I’m not looking forward to it.
I think his endgame is just boosting his ego. He tried to get this X thing to stick since the PayPal days.
We are just watching the midlife crisis of a guy with way too much money showing that billionaires are not immune to terminally online brain rot.
Law is a sham that only enables corporations apparently.
Why was it ever allowed for companies to make unilateral contracts with no representation or limits? The entire ecosystem of digital platforms is full of absolutely ridiculous terms and agreements.
Not only there is no reason why digital media shouldn’t be treated as a regular purchase, they want it both ways. Digital storefronts don’t say “license” or “rent”. They say “Buy”, because they know people want to buy it, and many of them wouldn’t pay if they couldn’t buy it. It’s downright deceptive that they label the transaction as a purchase then put a wall of legalese on some corner saying “actually ‘buy’ does not mean buy”.
I think Reddit will still be around, but when it comes to Twitter, the acquisition saddled the company with billions in debt amounting to around a billion in yearly interest repayment. Twitter already was barely making ends meet before that, and it only lost revenue for all the stupid decisions being made. Even if it was exactly as profitable as before, it wouldn’t be enough anymore.
One day Twitter is simply going to stop working, or close off so much it becomes unusable, unless Musk personally tries to keep it afloat at expense of his own fortune, or someone is dumb enough to buy it off of him and do the same.
I also see a lot of wishful thinking in the Fediverse, but this is not the case here. People there may not want to move on, but it’s not gonna keep it afloat. I already see a lot of people making their escape plans and linking alternative platforms every day.
Don’t give him too much credit. Elon is transparently too terminally online to be destroying Twitter because that’s his goal. He didn’t even actually mean to buy it until he was forced to.
Parents badly need to understand how bad these things are, because even games explicitly for children these days are full of it, and it has been going on for over a decade already.
Could a language model actually independently discern if a source is trustworthy? Seems that’s something difficult to determine when it comes to possible leaks. The kinds of AIs that we have today can’t really conceptualize a world outside the texts they process, they can only check based on other texts and user input.
Please drink verification can
This analogy is not even remotely applicable.
I unironically love that game. It was equal parts bold and stupid. Where else you can find a game about a cartoon mascot character who can side with a alien-demon invasion to try to kill the president and the hero protagonist? SEGA can be judged for many things but they weren’t afraid to dare.
I also really like how they did multiple endings. I know ultimately there is a single canon one but it’s still interesting to see all the others.
Compared to Sonic Heroes which was released during the same generation, I like this game much more.
You can get Mario + Rabbids very cheaply from time to time, it’s one of the few exclusive Switch games you’ll get a good price on.
Depends on the game but I don’t think people needed high-end TVs to notice the difference. When I was a kid and I first tried emulation, I remember noticing how some games looked weird and blocky on PC, even though my CRT TV was an extra blurry hand-me-down.
Yeah, there were pretty much two types of pixel art in games. Those made for TV-based games up to PS1 which are expected to be seen through CRT blur so they rely more on complex gradients and precise use of contrast. And those made for LCD portables, which were always expected to be sharp and clear and tend to lean more into a blocky style. Modern indie games are largely an evolution of the latter.
Some people play it like fantasy accounting, Some people play it like improv with fidget toys. Good thing I’m here to tell everyone the right way to play.