Leonard Nimoy and the animal actor who portrayed the Alfa 177 canine (in all likelyhood) are both dead.

I would prefer a world where a cute happy dog and Leonard Nimoy were still with us and William Shatner had died, twice.

Also this doggo is absolutely adorable in that costume

The wrong two of those actors are dead. ☹️
It should have been Shatner, twice.

Explanation: Clarence Thomas is missing. Many people 🤞 hope he’s dead. This meme proffers he should be held to account for his many, many crimes whether-or-not he is a corpse, invoking through it’s use of Jean-Paul Laurens’ 1870 painting Le Pape Formose et Étienne VI the precedent of putting a dead body of a political figure on trial.

deleted by creator

When I was around 8, my dad made the comment that it would have been easier for a trans lesbian to find partners if they’d never transitioned.

Profferers of that view reveal they see women as fungible, else they’d comprehend lesbians want to date lesbians.

when isn’t kbin being funky

As I said, though, this funk is fresh.

Still the best way to interact with activitypub.

That was supposed to be a reply to this post but kbin is being a little funky fresh at present.

Here’s another source if you get through all of QZAP with no results (or just want another batch to look through).

Here’s a wiki which may help your search.

Here is a further resource.

Here’s another you can search through as well.

Here’s an archive which probably won’t help your search, but while I’m linking things you should totally check out regardless

Recently, Oklahoma always wins

Are they allowed to just always do that Rodgers and Hammerstein number each year or are they forced to switch it up?

…it isn’t real?

The objective metric is how high and long you can draw out notes.

Doesn’t that unfairly favor states at higher altitudes?

😒

If you have a couple of Alexa devices

…then you have a couple too many. Why do you want Jeff Bezos listening to your fuck?

It’s pudding.

Pudding ATP into your cells.

That’s one large Pipridae.

I call shenanigans!

Perhaps, but they are cheeky and fun-loving.

I refuse to respect corporations like I respect human beings, and I don’t think they deserve human rights or the influence they have over our government.

I don’t think corporations are people either. You and I agree on that.

I do think I was correct in my read of the OP screenshot as indicating a desire to own and profit of the labor of a “person”—a position which should be examined and the underpinnings of which roundly rejected.

At a base level it’s the same underpinning that inform people’s desire to be landlords.

Why is the entire burden of proof on me? Shouldn’t you have to prove I’ve never called a real person an “NPC?”

No, I shouldn’t. I never claimed it was a particularly fair bet. Probably should check the terms before accepting.

No, just when I find it humorous.

You find dehumanizing others humorous? You should work on being less terrible.

And I’d take that bet ;)

Prove you never have and I’d pay you, otherwise I will forward you a list of charities you can send your loss to. sarcastic smiley