unlawfulbooger@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 7 months agoDoomscrolling rulelemmy.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square34fedilinkarrow-up1884arrow-down10
arrow-up1884arrow-down1imageDoomscrolling rulelemmy.blahaj.zoneunlawfulbooger@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 7 months agomessage-square34fedilink
minus-squaremoosetwin@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up40·7 months agoidea for lemmy: sort by awful it’s just the highest proportion of downvotes to upvotes (with some minimum upvotes/comments) yes I do hate myself
minus-squareunlawfulbooger@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up20·7 months agoThat’s basically sort by controversial, no?
minus-squareDragonOracleIX@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up16·7 months agoNo, it would be the opposite of the top filter. Controversial is posts that have a similar amount of downvotes to upvotes.
idea for lemmy: sort by awful
it’s just the highest proportion of downvotes to upvotes (with some minimum upvotes/comments)
yes I do hate myself
That’s basically sort by controversial, no?
No, it would be the opposite of the top filter. Controversial is posts that have a similar amount of downvotes to upvotes.