• Gabu@lemmy.ml
    71·
    9 months ago

    I prefer ROCM:
    R -
    O -
    C -
    M -

    • Fuck me, it didn’t work again
    • stingpie@lemmy.world
      7·
      9 months ago

      Recently, I’ve just given up trying to use cuda for machine learning. Instead, I’ve been using (relatively) cpu intensive activation functions & architecture to make up the difference. It hasn’t worked, but I can at least consistently inch forward.

  • Uranium3006@kbin.social
    171·
    9 months ago

    Some numbnut pushed nvidia driver code with compilation errors and now I have to use an old Kernel until it’s fixed

    • scrion@lemmy.world
      12·
      9 months ago

      I started working with CUDA at version 3 (so maybe around 2010?) and it was definitely more than rough around the edges at that time. Nah, honestly, it was a nightmare - I discovered bugs and deviations from the documented behavior on a daily basis. That kept up for a few releases, although I’ll mention that NVIDIA was/is really motivated to push CUDA for general purpose computing and thus the support was top notch - still was in no way pleasant to work with.

      That being said, our previous implementation was using OpenGL and did in fact produce computational results as a byproduct of rendering noise on a lab screen, so there’s that.

    • Skullgrid@lemmy.world
      2·
      9 months ago

      I don’t know wtf cuda is, but the sentiment is pretty universal: please just fucking work I want to kill myself

      • topinambour_rex@lemmy.world
        3·
        9 months ago

        Cuda turns a gpu in to a very fast cpu for specific operations. It won’t replace the cpu, just assist it.

        Graphics are just maths. Plenty of operations for display the beautiful 3d models with the beautiful lights and shadows and shines.

        Those maths used for display 3d, can be used for calculate other stuffs, like chatgpt’s engine.