A marketing team within media giant Cox Media Group (CMG) claims it has the capability to listen to ambient conversations of consumers through embedded microphones in smartphones, smart TVs, and other devices to gather data and use it to target ads, according to a review of CMG marketing materials by 404 Media and details from a pitch given to an outside marketing professional. Called “Active Listening,” CMG claims the capability can identify potential customers “based on casual conversations in real time.”

  • penquin@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    11 months ago

    I’ve never met a person in my life that was convinced by an ad to buy something. I know I never have and never will, I actually stay away from things that are advertised to me. So these fucking brainless fucks are literally wasting their money and energy on ads. Every human being I know loaths ads and would love to erase them from existence. When will they ever get this?

    • admiralteal@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      This argument presumes that the entire many-billion and maybe even multiple-trillion dollar global ad industry is ALL based on complete, ineffective nonsense. That everyone has just been bamboozled. That’s a naive view, I think.

      The best argument for why we must be vigilant against ads and data collection by advertisers is because the shit does work. It influences people to make purchases, sometimes against their better judgement or reason. Because subverting someone’s agency over their own body and mind is heinous at a very high level.

      I’m certain you are wrong. You’ve absolutely purchased products that were advertised to you. You just didn’t make the connection between your decision and the advertisements. You THINK seeing an ad makes you unlikely to buy a product, but you likely only really notice and have an emotional response to the ads for products you weren’t likely to buy in the first place.

      • FfaerieOxide@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        11 months ago

        This argument presumes that the entire many-billion and maybe even multiple-trillion dollar global ad industry is ALL based on complete, ineffective nonsense.

        Strangers things have happened than money being thrown at bullshit.

        NFTs were a thing, recall.

        • admiralteal@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          11 months ago

          All the industry analysis of the ROI on advertising would’ve had to come to the same spurious conclusions about that effectiveness, too. With the largest, richest, and most profitable firms being the ones MOST fooled.

          No, I don’t think anything that strange has ever happened. This is basically a conspiracy theory.

          • FfaerieOxide@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 months ago

            A bunch of people making money jerking one another off and you think any one of them’d be in a rush to rock the boat?

            You sound much more conspiratorial with your “capitalism always results in rational and correct decisions” fallacy.

            • admiralteal@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              11 months ago

              You’ve literally just described your own view as believing in a grand conspiracy where all players have sworn themselves to secrecy in a scheme any one of them could undermine in a moment, so I guess that’s that.

              • FfaerieOxide@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                11 months ago

                I don’t see where I did that. To say you sound more conspiratorial (which you do) is not an admission of any conspiratorial thinking on my part.

                • admiralteal@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  A bunch of people making money jerking one another off and you think any one of them’d be in a rush to rock the boat?

                  In case you edit it away later. Very good, bye now.

                  • FfaerieOxide@kbin.social
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    11 months ago

                    Now is that me describing my view as …I believe the quote was “believing in a grand conspiracy”?

                    And don’t try to side-step that you were speaking metaphorically as you literally said

                    literally

                    You’ve literally just described your own view as

                    I did no such thing.

                    You seem to have a similar grasp on others’ words as you do the realities of economic systems.

      • penquin@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        I know for a fact that you’re wrong. You just are. I have never bought a single thing based on an ad, period.

        • Decoy321@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          21
          ·
          11 months ago

          My dude, no one is as self aware as you think you are. You do yourself a disservice by thinking so, it means you’re ignoring an exploitable weakness.

        • Nix@merv.news
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          11 months ago

          What phone do you hve? What computer? What shoes? What milk do you buy? Ads dont work by showing up and making you go buy it like a drone. You see the ads a thousand times and then you start believing its better than other products

          • Crashumbc@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            11 months ago

            Or even as subtle as brand recognition. Nobody can research every purchase and when you walk walk up to two items and one sounds familiar. You’re more likely to buy that one.

      • Spectacle8011A
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Advertisements aren’t about convincing people to immediately buy a product or service. They’re about opening people up to the idea that it exists. It’s why anti-smoking ads are called “awareness campaigns”. People don’t buy things they don’t know exist. Advertisements certainly aren’t about convincing people not in the company’s target market to buy their product. I’m not going to buy a Pixel 8 Pro even after 40 advertisements if I already own a Pixel 7a I bought several months ago (real life example). Advertisements are about getting the right message in front of the right people at the right time.

        Advertising is manipulative in the same way movies or books are manipulative; they put forward ideas you might be receptive to. If the customer finds the product worthwhile, and the company gets paid for their work, I don’t see the evil so many associate with advertising.

        Anyway, I use an adblocker and don’t watch TV.

    • LollerCorleone@kbin.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      11 months ago

      You are generalizing too much here. I know many who have tried out a product only after seeing its ad. Ads can give plenty of returns to brands. But targeted ads which even exploits our most intimate conversations are really bad news for our right to privacy.

      • penquin@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        I said “I’ve never met a person”… then “every human being I know”. Does that count as generalizing? This is basically my circle of the people I know.

        • nevernevermore@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          11 months ago

          I said “I’ve never met a person”… then “every human being I know”. Does that count as generalizing?

          generalize | ˈdʒɛn(ə)rəlʌɪz | verb | 1 make a general or broad statement by inferring from specific cases

          Literally, yes.

          • penquin@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 months ago

            If you say generalize within my circle of people that I know then yes I agree with you, but generalizing in general means everyone, even those I don’t know and have never met, and I didn’t say that. So, literally not yes. lol

            • nevernevermore@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              11 months ago

              so then your argument is companies are wasting money because you and your circle aren’t affected by advertising? how big is your circle that companies should fear not appealling to it?

      • RaincoatsGeorge@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        Ive absolutely bought shit that ended up as an embedded ad after I visited the page previously. Youre just more likely to follow through if you see it over and over again.

        Its not really a complex concept.

    • PM_ME_VINTAGE_30S [he/him]@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      11 months ago

      I’ve never met a person in my life that was convinced by an ad to buy something.

      I believe that you’re being truthful, but I respectfully challenge the idea that you don’t know some person who was convinced by an ad to buy something. Even if all your friends truthfully insist that their decisions are not swayed by ads, there is probably some product they chose at least partially because an advertisement reached them and left a positive impression about the product.

      Ads do clearly work on people who are suggestible enough to be susceptible to them. Some of your contacts are probably these people whether they admit to it or not. If ads didn’t work, they wouldn’t be made. Ads aren’t made inherently to be annoying or make our lives worse; they’re driven by profit. Kill the profit and the motive dies. IMO that’s all the more reason to get rid of them.

      Anecdotally, my parents and grandmother watch TV with commercials, and they give me a bug-eyed look when I explain to them that I don’t get advertisements and that I don’t want to see them. Most people I know just want to get content crammed down their content-holes and will deal with ads to avoid the momentary inconvenience of change. So I feel like we’re fighting an uphill battle.

    • Jay@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      When I was a kid there were some things I’d see and wanted, only to get them and be seriously disappointed. I learned quickly that ads are fluff.

      Nowadays, I actively stay away from things I’ve seen advertised. The way I see it is if a company has to pay tons of money to get their product seen, it can’t be all that good to start with. Genuinely good products don’t need to try and convince you they’re worth it.

      • penquin@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Oh boy, all those toys ads on TV where the make the toy look so awesome with all those animations then you get it, and it’s a piece of plastic that does absolute none of they advertised.

    • speck@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      I mostly agree. But that ad with the unicorn shitting ice cream and kids eating was a rare exception that worked

    • saltesc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      I’ve gotten a type of product I didn’t know existed before, but it’s never been the brand that alerted me to it. From experiences, brands that advertise generally have the lower quality and less value for money product. Brands that don’t advertise but you frequently see mentioned are generally the top tier shit for quality and value and they don’t need to advertise.

      • penquin@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Thank you!!! I’ve always said that. If you need to advertise it so hard then it’ll probably suck.

    • Maeve@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Marketing psychology works on sub/unconcious triggers. You could study Ed Bernays as a rudimentary source.

    • three@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      met a guy in the psych ward who convinced his doctor to put him on an antidepressant because of an ad on tv.

    • shani66
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Ads only work when you are searching them out yourself. Like, if i go to steam looking to buy a new game I’d be susceptible to a video game ad. And ads for established brands are complete wastes of money, I’m not gonna buy a coke because i saw an ad for it.