• ChrisLicht@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      11 months ago

      Maybe this is the equivalent of defending ethical capitalism, but an ad-supported model can enable poor users to access content they couldn’t afford if it were paid.

      • DogMuffins@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        No, that’s just how it appears through the advertising revenue model.

        Bear in mind this model has been actively developed over the last 20+ years. Imagine of other models enjoyed that kind of attention.

        Consumers pay for ads in product costs. Access for poor people is a myth.

        • WasPentalive@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          If you are too poor to consume the advertised items/services then the actual customers of those products/services are paying for your access.

          I personally use an ad-blocker, but I only hate ads because they can be a vector for malware. P.s. I also use StartPage as my search engine of choice.

    • ares35@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      he co-founded deepmind, which was acquired by google. he also worked at google itself (left last year). he knows a fair bit about google and its inner workings, especially in regards to ai tech integration into its various properties. so more than just a ‘competitor’ or ‘businessowner’

    • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      I mean, he’s not wrong in the sense that Google’s paradigm of leveraging ads and data harvesting and monetization on literally everything is a cancer.