• SRo@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      Starfield isn’t a great game but no man’s lie is not better. Both are kinda shitty. Norman’s sky was just way worse when it was released.

        • SRo@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Good for you if you like it. It’s still a soulless collectaton with meh building options and meh combat. It’s better than it was at release but it’s still a absolute average game.

          • rambaroo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            The building options are also better than SF though. It’s just much more intuitive and less grindy than Starfield is.

          • Catradora-Stalinism☭@lemmygrad.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            I don’t play it myself, my brother does. It seems fun for those who love exploration, and the worlds at least have some variety and the campaign holds more interest than that of starfields’.

            Although yeah. At the end of the day we’re a bunch of peasants who are arguing over which type of moldy bread is best, while the lords still get their money for the purchase.