• SRo@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    Starfield isn’t a great game but no man’s lie is not better. Both are kinda shitty. Norman’s sky was just way worse when it was released.

      • SRo@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Good for you if you like it. It’s still a soulless collectaton with meh building options and meh combat. It’s better than it was at release but it’s still a absolute average game.

        • rambaroo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          The building options are also better than SF though. It’s just much more intuitive and less grindy than Starfield is.

        • Catradora-Stalinism☭@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          I don’t play it myself, my brother does. It seems fun for those who love exploration, and the worlds at least have some variety and the campaign holds more interest than that of starfields’.

          Although yeah. At the end of the day we’re a bunch of peasants who are arguing over which type of moldy bread is best, while the lords still get their money for the purchase.