• Communist@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    …they started over, and then they made a completely functional thing that could actually be improved, that you don’t like because… waypipe wasn’t implemented first?

    What exactly is your problem with wayland?

    • PseudoSpock@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s not X12, and not even half of what X11 was. It was made by people with all the wrong agendas and it still took them over 10 years to come up with something not even half of what X11 was. It (Wayland)… needs… to… die… So that proper resources can be dedicated to making of X12. And if possible, make it forever impossible for any games that aren’t Linux native, or just no games at all, which is even better. So many hours wasted on making that wayland and the same for games, resources that should have always been spent on making a real X12.

      • Communist@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        You live in imagination land.

        Nobody devs x11 because they all hate it, and you think you know better than EVERYBODY who has actually touched the code.

        Wayland is currently fine, why not take your own advice and make it work better rather than improve something that is so fundamentally broken that literally nobody who has tried thinks it’s even possible to fix.

        You know significantly less than the x11 devs, yet you confidently assert that you have a better solution. Do you honestly think nobody tried to work on x11? Everybody did, and they all gave up, because it’s an unworkable mess.

        • PseudoSpock@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Nothing wrong with a re-write. Just make it backwards compatible and use the same protocols… and most certainly, do not drop core features.

          • Communist@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            The protocols were fundamentally broken, that’s the problem.

            They destroyed security, they made multiple displays with mixed refreshrates and DPI’s impossible, and many other fundamental issues.

          • Communist@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Uh… okay. There’s a reason nobody who knows what they’re talking about agrees with you, you’re a very confident person who knows very little.