cultural reviewer and dabbler in stylistic premonitions
It’s amazing how so many people here are completely oblivious to sarcasm.
from this commercial, apparently it’s a joke but also a real product from Daily Wire 😬
What a confused image.
actually it stands for “Privacy-Preserving Attribution”.
They had to make it the default though. That was unavoidable.
For it to be useful at scale, sure, but reading this it sounds like Chrome’s version of it is still “experimental” and opt-in. Hopefully the backlash prevents it from being developed further.
It has come to my attention that many of the people complaining about #Firefox’s #PPA experiment don’t actually understand what PPA is, what it does, and what Firefox is trying to accomplish with it
The documentation under the “Learn more” link next to the “Allow websites to perform privacy-preserving ad measurement” checkbox in Firefox preferences explains very clearly what it is and how it works. Asserting that people who read that and are indignant about it being enabled by default just… “don’t actually understand” it is absurdly insulting and basically gaslighting.
this isn’t remotely how this meme is used lol
wikipedia articles about him have been deleted twice:
lol, i just accepted the title tag from the page which the create post form auto-filled 🤡
Redhat, however, found this solution too simple and instead devised their own scheme for assigning network interface names. It fails at solving the problem it was created to solve
I somehow first read “Redhat” as “Reddit” in this sentence, and so was briefly thinking that perhaps this bad idea originated there 😂
(probably the most downvoted post i’ve made yet on lemmy 😂)
i guess maybe if you’re using a device with a tiny screen and a lemmy client that doesn’t let you zoom in on images
17 × 59 = 10003
you’ve got an extra zero in there, and you forgot the 1, but the rest of your divisors match my crude brute-force approach:
>>> n=31521281
>>> d = [ x for x in range(1,n//2+1) if not n%x ]
>>> d
[1, 11, 17, 59, 187, 649, 1003, 2857, 11033, 31427, 48569, 168563, 534259, 1854193, 2865571]
>>> yours=list(map(int,"11+17+59+2857+11033+534259+1854193+2865571+168563+48569+10003+31427+649+187".split("+")))
>>> set(yours) - set(d)
{10003}
>>> set(d) - set(yours)
{1, 1003}
>>> sum(d)
5518399
same conclusion though: 5518399 also ≠ 31521281
>>> isperfect = lambda n: n == sum(x for x in range(1,n//2+1) if not n%x)
>>> [n for n in range(1, 10000) if isperfect(n)]
[6, 28, 496, 8128]
(from https://oeis.org/A000396 i see the next perfect number after 8128 is 33550336 which is too big for me to wait for the naive approach above to test…)
>>> divisors_if_perfect = lambda n: n == sum(d:=[x for x in range(1,n//2+1) if not n%x]) and d
>>> print("\n".join(f"{n:>5} == sum{tuple(d)}" for n in range(10000) if (d:=divisors_if_perfect(n))))
6 == sum(1, 2, 3)
28 == sum(1, 2, 4, 7, 14)
496 == sum(1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 31, 62, 124, 248)
8128 == sum(1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, 127, 254, 508, 1016, 2032, 4064)
shoutout to the person who reported this post with “Reason: Bot meme, you can’t even read it. whoever replies is a bot too” 😂
it’s the same joke as “caesar salad was invented by julius caesar”
Except it’s a bit different because the Caesar in Caesar salad (named after chef Caesar Cardini) is actually spelled the same way as Julius Caesar, whereas Neapolitan (meaning of Naples) is not related to the name Napoleon at all.
It hadn’t occurred to me that Neapolitan ice cream might have something to do with the name Napoleon before I saw this meme; the similarity of the words and incorrect implication that they are related is what makes it funny.
I think OP has no idea that it’s called Neapolitan ice cream
(i think you’re mistaken, and also that OP’s meme is good)
Neapolitan ice cream is not named after Napoleon
For some reason that article doesn’t link to it, but it is a real tweet he made in February (and didn’t even delete after being called out for the highlighted search terms in his screenshot).