• Makeshift@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I can absolutely understand that point of view and even agree to an extent.

    However, as a counterpoint: creative people being able to support themselves with their work means they can focus on their art instead of it just being a side hobby to their money making job

    • BCsven@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yes, but then you get channels like Linus Tech Tips where it became less about product reviews and just about volume production garbage content and forced contraversial content to keep revenue stream.

      • AngryMob@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 year ago

        You also get countless other smaller channels that are just large enough to have youtube be their primary income, but small enough where they stay true to their original intent.

        • BCsven@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Anytime it is your primary income there is built in propensity to stray to ensure you income is maintained when viewership might wane. I think the channels where a dude works full time and youtube is the side gig has more chance of maintaining integrity.

      • nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Seems a lot of channels grow and employ more people but for like no reason now they have a bunch of employee’s and costs and have to undermine their morals and quality to push out content to make money. In reality the quality of content has gone down so what was the point except employing friends and family at best.