• ramble81@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    21
    ·
    1 year ago

    Someone is paying for it. The manufacturer is not just giving it away for free. That means your taxes are going towards it.

      • BraveSirZaphod@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        That isn’t contradictory with what that person said.

        Things have costs, even things that are free at point-of-service. Often, those costs are worth it. It’s not as if they said that any use of tax money for any purpose is a horror.

        • gnuhaut@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Oh shit, blast from the past. Haven’t heard this libertarian talking point in a while.

          Every time someone gets a free beer, the libertarians point out that there is no such thing as free beer. Except that’s not true: They don’t mind free beer usually, it’s almost always some social program that’s “not free”. Hey guess what: Everybody already knows that vaccines do not grow on trees. No need to explain this. Libertarians just hate social programs because they are selfish pricks rugged individuals.

      • DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        This might be a wild take, but your taxes shouldn’t be subject to profiteering just because it’s to save lives. They should instead, at a minimum, be subject to reasonable price caps to combat racketeering.

        Edit: Especially when Canada is only vulnerable to it in the first place thanks to neoliberal policies privatizing Connaught Labs, gutting their research and quality, yet still somehow increasing prices.