• N4CHEM@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    So the definition of what “Latino” is comes from… the US institutions?

    • SomeoneElseMod@feddit.ukOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The person in the tweet is American so I used the American census definition. I’m pretty confident any reputable source doesn’t count “loving hard” as a valid reason to identify as Latino.

      • bob_wiley@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        According to the American census people from the Middle East get lumped in with white people, and are basically not counted, even though it is a distinct region with a distinct culture, and there was a lot of profiling going on after 9/11 where certain Americans thought every person from that area was Muslim, and every Muslim was a terrorist (all things they were confidently incorrect about). My belief in the census being a good definition for anything is pretty low with this being how they count. It seems they only break out a special group if it’s politically popular to do so. I noticed this when I was filling out the 2020 census form.

        Check out questions 8 and 9

        https://www2.census.gov/programs-surveys/decennial/2020/technical-documentation/questionnaires-and-instructions/questionnaires/2020-informational-questionnaire-english_DI-Q1.pdf

        I’ve always been curious why Latinos get their own question, then the rest of the world gets another. Meanwhile, Lebanese and German people are lumped together… what?

      • N4CHEM@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Obviously the “loving hard” part is dumb, but I hope you see the irony on posting this tweet and then citing for the definition of “Latino” a website from a US institution