• jonne@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    67
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    They have no idea how Red Hat was making money, they’re just squeezing it dry.

    • jasondj@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      RedHats focus is on Enterprise Linux, Openshift, AWX, etc.

      Are they even a “competitor” in enterprise Linux desktop? Enterprise Linux servers, sure, and I suppose a good number of orgs who don’t want to deal with dissimilar “user” distros, but I’d think Canonical would have enterprise desktop Linux pretty much sealed by now.

      • Nebulizer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’ve had a couple jobs with RHEL workstations, and the university I went to had RHEL workstations too. Not sure what their market share is compared to canonical, but they definitely have a bunch of deployments on desktop.

      • merthyr1831@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        “Enterprise” linux just feels like something RH invented for their own brand.

        You can get LTS releases of a bunch of distros already, and some even offer similar levels of enterprise support (SUSE comes to mind).

        I’ve seen orgs run their own distro/spin or something like Zorin or Ubuntu if they don’t want RHEL.

        • jasondj@ttrpg.network
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          This is a fair point, but I don’t think Linux would be nearly as adopted in the business world without that branding. It’d be some fringe hobbyist thing and BSD would probably have become the server operating system of choice.