• WizzCaleeba@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Infinity won’t let me log in. So far I’m really liking Sync. And I’m completely fine with a subscription at it’s current price. I’m happy to support devs. 8 don’t like working for free. Not sure why they should have to. And so it’s either ads or subscriptions. Pick your poison.

    • Metaright@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      And so it’s either ads or subscriptions. Pick your poison.

      Please think really hard for a moment and try to consider whether there are more ways to purchase something than by subscription or ad support.

      • WizzCaleeba@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        One time payments would be great, but the devs make a lot more from subscriptions. You don’t see services like Netflix or Hulu offering one time payments options. As a consumer, I love it, but the devs might not be able to sustain the app from that model. I’d be interested if you have any other ideas though.

        • Metaright@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          You’ve moved the goalposts. First, you said this:

          I’m happy to support devs. 8 don’t like working for free. Not sure why they should have to. And so it’s either ads or subscriptions.

          In other words, if you don’t pay a subscription or see ads, the developer gets no money at all. You’re using the app “for free.”

          Now you’re saying that it’s not “for free,” just not enough to make a living. And what’s more, you’re using a mere suspicion to justify your very confident insistence that we need to “pick our poison,” and that a one-time purchase is just not an option.

          Basically, my point is that you need to choose what point you want to make and stick with it, because your argument has changed dramatically in the course of just two comments.