• darq@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 year ago

      Of all sad words of tongue or pen,
      The saddest are these:
      Stallman was right again.

  • wiredfire@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 year ago

    Everyone going mad and many suggesting “if you have it use Safari instead!” when Apple implemented essentially this same thing quite some time ago in Safari 🤔

    That said intentions are important. I have little faith that Big G’s goal is anything other than self servin.

    • anlumo@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s a very different thing when a browser with negligible market share does that.

      • aeternum@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I have hope that the FTC will antitrust those cunts. At least I hope so. I’m not gonna hold my breath though.

        • argv_minus_one@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Microsoft put Netscape and Stac out of business and got away scot-free, so yeah, not holding my breath either.

  • Elw@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Part of me wants to believe that this won’t be abused and it’ll actually make the web better. The other part of me knows better.

    They could, theoretically, implement this on a way that just changes the pay structure for ad impressions but I think that all that will do is incentivize website owners using Google ads to block or nag “non-compliant” users… but here’s hoping they don’t abuse it I guess because there’s basically nothing we can do to change it once it’s out there. Genies out and all that

    • Alto@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      1 year ago

      They outright said in their own press release it’s primarily to increase ad visibility by breaking ad blockers.

      There’s no scenario where this makes the web better

      • snarf@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        The irony is that I wasn’t that against ads until they got super intrusive and started causing performance issues and breaking web pages. And of course the privacy problems with tracking cookies. But yeah, fuck all ads now, and fuck Google for trying to wring as much ad revenue out of me as possible. I switched to Firefox with uBlock.

        • ShadowPouncer@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Every now and then, I try to browser without an ad blocker.

          That generally lasts until I encounter something that’s bad enough that I don’t really have a choice, and then I turn it back on.

          The page needs to actually function. It needs to be possible to click on something and actually be clicking on the thing that you’re intending to.

          And it can not have stuff that blinks in a manner that causes a segment of the population (which includes me at times, but not 100% of the time) significant neurological problems.

          That last one has been the driving force behind stuff getting reenabled a fair bit.

          Oh, and if it’s ads on video content, they need to be at least vaguely reasonable in regards to interruptions and length. Youtube is way past that at this point.