• Alto@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    1 year ago

    They outright said in their own press release it’s primarily to increase ad visibility by breaking ad blockers.

    There’s no scenario where this makes the web better

    • snarf@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The irony is that I wasn’t that against ads until they got super intrusive and started causing performance issues and breaking web pages. And of course the privacy problems with tracking cookies. But yeah, fuck all ads now, and fuck Google for trying to wring as much ad revenue out of me as possible. I switched to Firefox with uBlock.

      • ShadowPouncer@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Every now and then, I try to browser without an ad blocker.

        That generally lasts until I encounter something that’s bad enough that I don’t really have a choice, and then I turn it back on.

        The page needs to actually function. It needs to be possible to click on something and actually be clicking on the thing that you’re intending to.

        And it can not have stuff that blinks in a manner that causes a segment of the population (which includes me at times, but not 100% of the time) significant neurological problems.

        That last one has been the driving force behind stuff getting reenabled a fair bit.

        Oh, and if it’s ads on video content, they need to be at least vaguely reasonable in regards to interruptions and length. Youtube is way past that at this point.