• superkret@feddit.orgOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    24 hours ago

    In an enterprise environment, you rely on a service that tracks CVEs, analyzes which ones apply to your environment, and prioritizes security critical updates.
    The issue here is that one of these services installed a release upgrade because Microsoft mislabelled it as security update.

    • NocturnalEngineer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Should still be doing phased rollouts of any patches, and where possible, implementing them on pre-prod first.

      • SomeGuy69@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        17 hours ago

        For security updates in critical infrastructure, no. You want that right away, in best case instant. You can’t risk a zero day being used to kill people.

        • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 hours ago

          Even security updates can be uncritical or supercritical. Conault the patch notes or get burned lol

      • mosiacmango@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        18 hours ago

        Pre-prod is ideal, but a pipe dream for many. Lots of folks barely get prod.

        We still stagger patching so things like this only wipe some of the critical infrastructure, but that still causes needless issues.