• TʜᴇʀᴀᴘʏGⒶʀʏ@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Huh? I initially said “right.” Which means “correct”/“yes.” You never asked for an explanation. You asked a yes or no question, which I answered, and then complained that I didn’t offer an explanation?

      • Madison420@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        Right is an affirmation of receipt, yes no or maybe are the possible answers and you didn’t choose any of the above and still failed to explain.

        Anarchism exists yes, that didn’t imply you are an anarchist you could be part of any similarly idiotic idealist nonsense.

        If it’s a battle of wit, you’re losing.

        • Right is an affirmation of receipt, yes no or maybe are the possible answers and you didn’t choose any of the above and still failed to explain.

          You said “so no laws?” And I said “right.” That’s pretty clear cut to me. What do you want explained?

          you could be part of any similarly idiotic idealist nonsense.

          Fear not, I’m also part of plenty of other nonsense

          If it’s a battle of wit, you’re losing.

          Lol

          • Madison420@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            Right. Is this your first time encountering an anarchist?

            Left. The word you’re looking for is correct, right is an affirmation or direction. Nothing, I want you to explain your belief system so you can see it in front of you and go "well that’s kinda fuckin stupid huh?.

            Undoubtedly so I have no doubt.

            Idiots tend to laugh a lot so, par for the course I suppose.