• Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        57 minutes ago

        Hubris. Democrats lose because characters like RBG and President Biden simply could not fathom that stepping aside was ALWAYS what they should have done.

        These miserable fucking dinosaurs have gambled away the good intentions, hopes, and stability of the entire nation because their internal mantra was that they are our political saviors, while everyone under 50 was full-throated screaming that they needed to step aside.

        Fuck all you geriatric, foot on the gas, oblivious, incompetent fucks. If (big if) we ever regain our Democracy, the first thing on the agenda should be AGE CAPS for all public offices. Elderly fucking hubris has doomed us to more misery.

        • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          28 minutes ago

          Age caps are good.

          A rating voting system would be good too.

          But I don’t think there won’t be younger people with the same kind of hubris.

        • alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          28 minutes ago

          Kyrsten Sinema is in her 40s, Bernie Sanders is in his 80s.

          Age is not the factor here.

          • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            4 minutes ago

            Literally the oldest president-elect in American history, but keep acting like age matters.

            It’s attitude. It’s playing by the rules or bending them. Republicans figured out the cheat codes…they can bend the rules and win, or at the very least not lose. Because you can’t, honestly, compete with that. It’s impossible. Lies are far easier to create than they are to refute.

            So either Dems have to go low, and lower the bar further, bend the rules more, and be just as guilty of breaking democracy as the GOP…or they can play clean and lose. There is no winning for the Democrats, and there is no losing for the Republicans. They found the cheat codes.

            What’s more, they got seized control of the anti-cheat (SCOTUS) 4 years ago. Stubbornness is a part of it, sure…RBG was too stubborn to leave at an opportune time…but let’s not kid ourselves over GOP hypocrisy when it came time to fill her seat, and let’s not consider whether or not Trump is stubborn.

            Republicans can do no wrong, but Democrats have to be perfect.

  • demizerone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Democratic party is fucking useless. We will never be free unless we rid ourselves of legalized corruption.

    • timbuck2themoon@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Poor take. Truthfully, the people want hate. That’s what trump ran on and promised.

      This isn’t about policy or likeability or whatever. This is what people want and they proved it. Stop blaming the Democrat party and blame what this country and its people are instead.

      • Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        49 minutes ago

        Are you kidding? The DNC circumvented the entire primary process to give us ANOTHER “anointed one” and, again, possibly the worst candidate possible to create the coalition that has always been Democrats bread-and-butter. They even had Hillary go down to FL to lecture voters, while Bill went to Michigan to preach to Muslim communities about why the war in Israel is right. It’s a fucking lampoon of strategy.

        Every single DNC “elite” should retire from politics, today. They’re losers, and losers lose. Because they never learn from their mistakes, which is what is required to win.

        • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          23 minutes ago

          They are elite. Not in quotes. The fact that they remain an elite and will remain an elite under Trump shows us that they are not losers and they don’t lose.

          They didn’t lose control over DNC, that’s what they care about, perpetual real power over half the politics in one big country, not temporary and limited power over all of it.

          In this case they have also shown Trump and anybody else that they are a very convenient opposition, that should remain as it is. It’s a win.

          But you’re the guys who flew to the Moon, invented nukes and the Internet. You’ll think of something.

      • tyo_ukko@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Hate and simple answers. Trump will “fix inflation” and “bring jobs back”, what could be better? Don’t ask how or what it will cost.

    • ℍ𝕂-𝟞𝟝@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      I wonder how quickly will the US progress from Elon Musk prancing around on stage to Trump Jack Ma-ing him, or if Bloomberg will commit suicide by six shots to the back of the head.

      The golden age of the US oligarchy has been this past period. Under fascism, the causal relationship between having power and money reverses.

      • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        21 minutes ago

        WDYM, Hitler was pretty friendly with German oligarchy. No suiciding them or something, their relationships were pretty chill, having fun together, going to countryside, going to each other with families, having coffee.

      • Blackmist@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 hours ago

        It depends if Vance can place a rollerskate at the top of the White House steps before that happens.

        • ℍ𝕂-𝟞𝟝@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Look at Russia’s oligarchs. Hell, look at Hungary.

          There was this one wealthy guy bankrolling Orbán’s campaigns, one of the wealthiest people in Hungary. He got into an argument with Orbán publicly. Today he’s neither wealthy, nor living in Hungary.

          The people will not turn on rich people. I’m saying rich people are used to be controlling politics, but in a Russian style system, rich people are controlled BY politics, not the other way around.

          • Fedizen@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            2 hours ago

            He’s still alive and no longer in hungary? so like rich people might move to their vacation estate for a year or two? this is just ordinary rich people stuff except instead of doing it for a tax cut they’re doing it because they publicly disagreed. Its theater. The whole point is to protect the money piles. It took russia like 20 years to start fussing about rich people that left the country

            • ℍ𝕂-𝟞𝟝@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 hour ago

              Imagine Murdoch arguing with Trump, trying to bankroll another party to rein him in, with it ending in him selling all his news outlets and retiring.

              The point is that money doesn’t get you political power in this system.

      • Kyrgizion@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        5 hours ago

        It’s more like all pretense is gone now. Before, there was this veneer of legitimacy. Now, it’s straight up fascism. It’s a matter of image projection.

      • XIIIesq@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        More like the oligarchy now have 99% of the power rather than 98%.

        The issue is that we believe we have a free democracy when the only power we have is to put an X in a box every few years. The system isn’t broken, it’s working as it’s designed to.

        • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          20 minutes ago

          The issue is that we believe we have a free democracy when the only power we have is to put an X in a box every few years.

          Right.

  • itsgroundhogdayagain@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    67
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    19 hours ago

    I do not trust Americans to “do their own research”. I’ve seen how that has gone in the past. Too many Americans do their own research while scrolling Facebook from the toilet.

    • XIIIesq@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Research requires a critical mind. Think of a person you know that has average intelligence, 50% of people are more stupid than that.

      And I’m not saying that stupidity is solely an issue for the republican electorate, I’m just saying “do your own research” is an unrealistic expectation.

      People need to be engaged with.

    • Sabata@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      38
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      18 hours ago

      “do their own research”

      That’s redneck for “I found someone that agrees with me on the Facebook”.

      • lulztard@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Satan himself could’ve posted that and he would still be right. Rather than being busy shitting on people for being the wrong kind of people who is right, you should shit on a people voting actual, literal Nazis ans facists into power.

  • grue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    167
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    23 hours ago

    Democracy supporters have to win every single time, while the fascists only have to win once. This is not a sustainable situation. We have to do what is necessary in a way that’s a lot more permanent than just winning an election.

    • Cornelius_Wangenheim@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 hours ago

      That’s only going to happen if the side in favor of democracy is given a decisive victory. Squeaking out another win isn’t going to be enough.

      • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        58 minutes ago

        Did Harris have any pro-democracy stuff in her platform, like ending FPTP or the Electoral College? Trump campaigned on bad election reforms like ID requirements and same-day voting.

    • Xanis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      19 hours ago

      That requires carrying this energy past the election cycle, regardless of the differences we may have on opinion, and coming together in agreement.

      Historically, the Left has been rather poor at banding together. We’re more likely to argue than get things done most of the time. So it’ll be an uphill battle for leaders of smaller groups across the Nation. First though, we need to make it past this hurdle.

        • Xanis@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          16 hours ago

          It’s still a choice that we should strive to utilize. Not doing so may mean not having that choice, or the illusion of one. I do agree though, it’s about time we shifted things back towards a better life for everyone.

    • anarchrist@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      43
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      23 hours ago

      I think a big part of this is rural over representation. Not even talking the senate, but the house to be fair should allot 1 rep per the minimum pop of any state, which would give us about 573 reps and like 676 electors for president. Hell if we did it as the founders intended, one per like 60k people we’d have a house of 5.6k members.

      • frezik@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        20 hours ago

        They also had slaves. A lot of slaves. Maybe we shouldn’t accept their fight against tyranny at face value.

        • bobs_monkey@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          22 hours ago

          “…The people can not be all, and always, well informed. The part which is wrong will be discontented in proportion to the importance of the facts they misconceive. If they remain quiet under such misconceptions it is a lethargy, the forerunner of death to the public liberty. We have had 13. states independant 11. years. There has been one rebellion. That comes to one rebellion in a century and a half for each state. What country before ever existed a century and half without a rebellion? And what country can preserve it’s liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance? Let them take arms. The remedy is to set them right as to facts, pardon and pacify them. What signify a few lives lost in a century or two? The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants. It is it’s natural manure. Our Convention has been too much impressed by the insurrection of Massachusets: and in the spur of the moment they are setting up a kite to keep the hen yard in order. I hope in god this article will be rectified before the new constitution is accepted.”

          • Thomas Jefferson to William Stephens Smith, Nov 13, 1787
          • idiomaddict@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            21 hours ago

            Let them take arms. The remedy is to set them right as to facts, pardon and pacify them.

            Good goddamn, Jefferson was wrong again. I bet this is what a lot of judges are thinking about when looking at J6 cases.

            • MonkeMischief@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              edit-2
              19 hours ago

              I also have this weird feeling that there was some assumption of gentleman’s decorum back then even with those one disagreed with.

              I appreciate his “forgive them, educate them, and move on” ideal. As if surely, once they’ve learned how things are, they will calm down! I wish it were that way.

              But I think he’d be (im/de)pressed with just how low the bar has fallen when it comes to civil human behavior, general education esp. in civic affairs, and practical reasoning. There is no line too far anymore. There is no punishment for violating foundational social contracts or civil discourse.

              One half is constantly flabbergasted that the other half keeps flagrantly violating the power of their office and saying “So what? I’m winning.”

              We’re just so far past the point of reason now.

              Edit: Also remember, Jefferson wrote this long before the Civil War. I believe his point in “forgive them and move on” was optimistically more in the interest of preserving the young Republic at all costs, rather than letting it crumble from the inside with internal feuds. (As is the fate of many rebellions)

              • Jiggle_Physics@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                8 hours ago

                Considering we had things like fist fight, a near fatal beating with a cane, etc on the floor of congress back then, I don’t think much of their old timey decorum

              • RedditRefugee69@lemmynsfw.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                15 hours ago

                I don’t think your assumption is accurate. They famously started shooting at a government because they taxed them a little more than they wanted to be taxed (to pay for a war we started).

      • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        21 hours ago

        They did a great job at that. It has lasted 248 years. But they also gave us a framework for updating our constitution and government, and that has been sorely neglected for a long time. The founders were wise enough to recognize that the system would need to change as times changed. What they didn’t seem to anticipate is the insane tribalism created by technologies that weren’t even a dream at the time, and how that tribalism would grind our government to a halt.

      • samus12345@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        21 hours ago

        Fascism was defeated because of the Allies, led by the US, the country with the most powerful military in the world by a large margin. Who’s going to defeat the US if it goes full fascist?

        • Sauerkraut@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          7 hours ago

          80% of Nazi casualties happened on the eastern front by the Communists. But yeah, the Soviet Union no longer exists, Russia has fallen to fascism, and now the US has too. The world is fucked.

        • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          20 hours ago

          It’s a good question that I don’t have the answer to, but I don’t think the USA would be able to continue funding a military 20x the expense of the next most powerful military while under authoritarian rule. We have the funds for such a military now because of a hundred different conditions that wouldn’t exist anymore under a fascist government.

          • MrMakabar@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 hours ago

            The US spends 3.4% of GDP in defence. Israel is at 5.3%. Also the US only spends a bit more then 3x what China spends and well US products are more expensive. So the US can probably fund its military for quite some time, without too many problems and right wingers love to do it, to bomb the shit out of people.

          • samus12345@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            22
            ·
            20 hours ago

            Fascist governments always collapse eventually because of loyalty over competence, but the thought of the damage a powerful country like the US would do before that collapse is terrifying.

    • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      18
      ·
      22 hours ago

      So what, at you going to start the french US revolution? That seems like a extreme idea that probably won’t end well.

      The US is a democracy. There is no threat outside of the fake information spread by US adversaries. Even if the worse president is elected there still little danger because of the balance of power.

      Don’t believe me? Look at the past. The supreme court and congress has put the executive branch in its place before. There is not more danger now than there was centuries ago. The US system is far from perfect but it is well proven.

      • Sauerkraut@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        7 hours ago

        The supreme court and congress has put the executive branch in its place before.

        The SC betrayed democracy with Citizens United and again when they gave Trump immunity for his countless crimes while in office. Don’t forget that the SC openly take bribes from billionaires.

      • draneceusrex@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        20 hours ago

        I hope you are right, but excuse me for having doubts. Both Congress and SCOTUS is much more partisan than it was in the past. SCOTUS’s ruling on presidential immunity is a direct example, eroding the checks and balances within the Constitution. McConnell’s behavior and vote during the Jan 6th Impeachment trial is a second example. Trump’s first term in 2016 started with him having no idea what he was doing, so he depended on establishment Republicans who would act as the adults in the room. That term ended with him having fired all of them, and with an attempted coup to stay in power. So far there have been no repercussions to him doing so. So yeah, excuse me for being worried about a potential “dictator on day one” who wants to deport millions of “illegals”, would send the military against his political opponents who he has labeled the “enemy within”, and to completely purge career public servants for loyalists (are you looking forward to Hershal Walker managing our National Missile Defense?).

      • yesman@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        22 hours ago

        There is not more danger now than there was centuries ago

        The way you describe American history as “centuries” like we’re the Roman Empire or Egypt when we’ve only got 2.5 centuries to choose from.

        • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          13 minutes ago

          Being a continuation of England more or less, you’ve got more. Especially since those democratic traditions were pretty English in the beginning.

        • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          20 hours ago

          Fair but my point still stands. We’ve been here a long time and though much worse times. (The US civil war comes to mind)

          • MonkeMischief@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            19 hours ago

            (The US civil war comes to mind)

            I mean hey you’re right, we’re still here…but we’d really REALLY like to prevent a second one of those…From the reviews I’ve read it wasn’t a fun time for pretty much anybody involved.

            • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              18 hours ago

              There is no chance of a second civil war. The current “crisis” is artificial and brought on by the media.

    • knightly the Sneptaur@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      23 hours ago

      There was never any democracy here to save, and no way to make it sustainable without tearing down the constitution and starting over, and no way to hold a new constitutional convention that wouldn’t be poisoned by money and power from the start.

      • Sauerkraut@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 hours ago

        You’re not completely wrong. There are many aspects of our system that are deeplh undemocratic: the way that the donor class gatekeeps who is able to run, the way politicians serve lobbyists and donors over the public will, and the way that oligarchs own 95% of our news media all create an environment where the interests of the people are not represented by our government

  • UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    16 hours ago

    I get why people say you “have to” vote against someone in a First Past The Post voting system. What I don’t get is the inaction from the democratic party on changing the voting system between elections.

    I wish the democrats had one tenth the urgency they claim to have. Democracy is one election away from falling… wouldn’t you want multiple chances to defeat the republicans every election?

    Democrats are so full of themselves, they won’t accept that they might have to step out of the way to prevent the republicans from ruining this country. This fight is greater then the democratic party. They should start acting like it by pushing to get rid of FPTP voting in the states they control.

    • zalgotext@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      16 hours ago

      What I don’t get is the inaction from the democratic party on changing the voting system between elections.

      1. The Democrats didn’t secure a large enough majority in previous elections to overcome Republican resistance to changing things like FPTP voting or the electoral college.

      2. There is a lot of contention within the Democratic party (at the federal level at least) as it shifts further towards the right in an effort to remain in power. Getting rid of FPTP voting would make it harder for centrist/right leaning Democrats to remain in power.

      Several states have switched to RCV for some of their elections, and progress has been slow, but it’s being made. If you want to see more, elect people that prioritize implementing better voting systems.

  • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    62
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    24 hours ago

    Four years ago we gave it a stay of execution. Until we fully purge the fascist and focus government to actually serve the people, we are going to keep finding ourselves in chaos, until China beats us to and at everything.

    • pjwestin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Yeah, a Trump victory scares me, but what scares me more is the more competent fascist that comes next. The Democrats can’t keep waiting for the Republicans to, “come to their senses.” The material conditions of the working class need to improve, or fascist populism will take in the absence of economic populism.

      • baggachipz@sh.itjust.worksOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        15 hours ago

        No other fascist has the cult of personality that trump does. If we can rid ourselves of this scourge, it will cause a reckoning and reset among the conservatives. I hope.

    • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      21 hours ago

      It’s crazy how the global powers have handed China so much power as a result of their insatiable greed. China was hardly a concern 40 years ago, but 4 decades of manufacturing and stealing literally everyone’s IP have given them resources they didn’t have access to before.

  • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Voting is like breathing.

    Every election is the most important one of yopur life.

          • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            9
            ·
            20 hours ago

            No is really isn’t

            Creating uncertainty is what the Russian influencing campaigns aim to do. The US is as strong as ever and there is no reason to worry at all. We have the balance of powers for a reason.

            • kitnaht@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              19 hours ago

              Look up Viktor Orban and how he successfully dismantled Democracy in Hungary. The plan has already been laid out, and it’s being followed precisely.

              Seriously – the parallels in that journey are shockingly similar.

              The US is as weak as ever as we have a stacked system due to Republicans following the same playbook, and slowly tipping the scales over the time using gerrymandering and whatever they can manage to pull off, any time they can manage to pull it off. We’re seeing less and less people responsible for more and more power. Our supreme court has ruled that the president is immune from prosecution, etc.

              There are plenty of additional examples, but the only way you’re arguing what you’re arguing is if you haven’t been paying attention. If you want more, feel free to look up Project 2025

              • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                18 hours ago

                I have looked it up and I think it was BS.

                Also they said the same thing about Biden and we are still here.

                • kitnaht@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  18 hours ago

                  Well that’s plenty of proof that you didn’t read anything about Viktor Orban at all. There was nothing about my previous reply that had anything to do with biden - not a single parallel at all. In fact, nobody of note has ever made any similar claim about Biden whatsoever. Thanks for taking the mask off. Have a great day.