• freamon@endlesstalk.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    True. It might have been better though if the Lemmy devs hadn’t been such cheapskates and forked over the 10 bucks it takes to get a domain name that isn’t sketchy.

    • emergencyfood@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      lemmy.ml was a sort of prototype made by the devs of the lemmy software. It wasn’t really meant for widespread public adoption. So it makes sense that they went with a free domain.

      • RaoulDook@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The parent domain was apparently well known to be a common host of phishing domains and scam sites. Free domains tend to attract those types, so that’s a good reason from the start not to use that if you want your site to be reliably accessible and findable on search engines.

      • RxBrad@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        My work uses zScaler for its Internet web filters. zScaler has everything *.ml blocked.

        So yeah, it’s fairly well-known to be sketchy.

          • Quokka@quokk.au
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Or maybe realising anything ending in .ml was most likely spam and if it caught the 5 legitimate Mali domains oh well, zero loss for anyone.

            Kinda like how I wouldn’t download a file from a .ru site.

      • Lemdee@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        I did, I just messed up and didn’t tell anybody. I’m sorry folks, this is on me.

      • SlovenianSocket@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yes. Hosting a service in a country other than where a TLD is designated for is bad practice and common knowledge for any web developer

    • Zagorath@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Pretty sure they went with .ml not for price reasons, but because they liked to pretend it stood for their political ideology.

      • freamon@endlesstalk.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        Maybe. I read the idea about it standing for Marxist/Leninist, but there’s thousands of TLDs now - if you can get .diamonds and .world, there’s probably something that would evoke the same lefty idea (although maybe lemmy pre-dates the new domains, I don’t know)

        • Flax@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          New domains have been around for a while. The fancy ones are a bit more pricey.