• Riskable@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    2 months ago

    Depends on how old your kids are… Are they old enough to understand suffering and loss? Then it’s time to make your kids suffer and lose some of their free time in order to learn something important; like any good parent!

    • LiteralGrill@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      2 months ago

      You’d rather have kids do it when they’re supervised and have love and support then when it is suddenly thrust upon them with no warning, that’s for sure.

      • yeather@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        No, they should have an older sibling who gives them a copy as a prank and all their friends come over to watch it.

      • LiteralGrill@ani.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Ahem… The film is rated…

        • USA: Not rated by the MPAA. Considered “suitable for all audiences” on the Central Park Media VHS release. TV-PG on the Sentai Filmworks release.
        • Germany: 6+ (Apropriate for ages 6 and up.)
        • France: Tous publics (General Audiences)
        • India: U (Unrestricted public exhibition, suitable for all ages.)
        • Hong Kong: Level 1 (Suitable for All Ages.)
        • Canada: G and PG for Quebec and Manitoba respectively.
        • Japan: G
        • Saudi Arabia: PG
        • Singapore: PG
        • Italy: T (Recommended for persons of all age groups.)
        • Taiwan: 0+ (Suitable for all ages)
        • Netherlands: 9 (Ages 9 and up)
        • Nigeria: PG

        You’d know that if you read the post! Funnily enough, it also links out to an neat article discussing a study showing parents aren’t reading scary stories to their kids… And why that’s bad. Here it is just in case ya need it! Heck, on other bits of social media, I heard about schools showing kids the movie in 5th to 6th grade, in the US even!

          • Riskable@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            its not meant for children, German fairytales aren’t either

            Woah there! German fairy tales were meant for children! That’s explicitly their target audience.

            The whole point was to scare the children into behaving a certain way. Like, “don’t go wandering off alone. Bad things can happen!”

            If you just tell your kid that they won’t listen. However, if you tell them a story about how kids that wandered off alone into a forest got cooked and eaten by a witch then maybe they’ll stick to the village (and be wary of strangers).

              • piccolo@ani.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                edit-2
                2 months ago

                Grimm fairytales

                don’t you mean, Kinder- und Hausmarchen? I wonder what that translates into english.

                Let’s be honest, back then 4 year olds were being sent to the mines. So the definition of a kid certainly has changed from then and now.

                  • piccolo@ani.social
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    2 months ago

                    Anyway, Kinder- UND Hausmärchen means “Child story’s And “Hausmärchen” (idk how to translate that)”

                    The English title is ‘Children’s and household tales’. I was curious what ‘märchen’ meant, and it means ‘fairy tales’.

                    Its of course a individual thing, but “you should show grave of the Fireflies to your child” just isn’t a good general advice.

                    the keyword ‘individual’ parents should be able to judge rather or not they are capable of handling the themes of the media presented. Like, if their lose their shit to Littlefoot’s mother dying… than yeah no, they certainly won’t handle anything worse lol

      • Riskable@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        Even though it’s a fictional, animated depiction of what happened near the end of the WW2 it’s depicting something that actually happened. I don’t think there’s going to be any problems in regards to separating fiction from reality with this movie.

        If anything, the movie is tame in comparison to the actual, real-world devastation of nuclear war.

          • LiteralGrill@sakurajima.moe
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            @YourPrivatHater @riskable Over 100,000 WWII vets are still alive, today. People are being bombed right now, shelled right now, having white phosphorus dropped on them, right now.

            None of this is a “long time ago.” It is within living memory.

              • LiteralGrill@sakurajima.moe
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                @YourPrivatHater Most seem to disagree. Child psychologists disagree. Ratings boards in multiple countries disagree. Kids who have, and continue to watch this movie in Elementary schools growing up healthily is big evidence against it being inappropriate too.

                Maybe you’re just wrong? Maybe folks shouldn’t hide the truths of the world from their kids?