• vrighter@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    as I said to the other guy, I’m not saying not natural is bad. But what op is implying is that getting the same stuff from natural sources is bad. That I just don’t agree with. It’s just the natural order of things. I have other options, yes, but I don’t consider the default natural source of things to be bad, so I don’t feel the need to switch. Animals eat animals all the time. And they don’t do it “humanely” either.

    • projectd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Why is it worse to get things from less natural sources? Ignoring that everybody get some of their vitamins from less natural sources, e.g. animals injected with B12, cereals fortified with iron, water and toothpaste with fluoride, synthesised morphines instead of smoking opium - would you say these things are bad too because they are less natural? And if so, why?

      Also, do you take all of your moral code from the worst things animals do? I hold myself to a higher standard and don’t eat my kids, rape, or fling shit at each others.

        • projectd@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Well fantastic - best to go for the one with the least impact to the environment and suffering then!

          To make one redundant point, a nice thing about the less natural sourcing of things is that exact dosages can be measured during synethesis - so when tree bark is swapped out for aspirin, opium for morphine etc. you can get reliable, pure dosages for medicine. I don’t think that’s really very important for vitamins of course.

    • irmoz@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Animals don’t have the options we do. That argument fails.

      Plus, that argument could be used to justify rape and murder. Perfectly natural. They don’t breed humanely.

        • projectd@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          Herbivores must, carnivores must not, omnivores with very high level thinking and moral agency is fortunate enough to choose.

            • projectd@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              Yes, I’m pretty sure a lion would die if he tried eating only plants, while I’d imagine a cow would die on a meat diet. I’m less well versed on non-human animal diets though, as I’ve never needed to give it a lot of thought.

              I do know that humans can be very strong, fit and healthy on a plant-based diet, as confirmed by the world’s medical institutions, and demonstrated by vegan athletes of all types.

    • m532@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Those factory farmed animals are further away from “natural” than a smartphone