One of the most compelling arguments I’ve heard. I must say I was a skeptic before but this really opened my eyes
One of the most compelling arguments I’ve heard. I must say I was a skeptic before but this really opened my eyes
I’ve seen at least 2 usernames that submit A LOT, and if you search your feed i’m sure you’ll be able to spot them easily. They also comment on rising posts quite a lot and personally mod a few communities. I’ve not seen them repost content that doesn’t get traction, but they do repost content taken from reddit
We have our own version of him here on lemmy as well
An image is worth 3.5 BILLION words
Totally agree, steam is one the big players that stills offers a quality service both for consumers and for developers
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
The golden rule of the internet. Anything hated at release has a high chance of becoming beloved once those who grew up with become adults.
Truly bad stuff at release simply ends up forgotten.
Nostalgia is way more powerful than rage
You gotta honor the cock
That’s what happens when the people running your government are paid by Russia
Well now in Argentina the only viable way to play games legally is through gamepass, after steam changed its prices last month
Re-reading their comment now and the way they phrased I don’t think I’m able to interpret it that way, but at the end of the day it doesn’t really matter. Glad we are on the same page now!
I know that channel and I recognised the video, I just haven’t watched it. I was just replying to the comment where they said it existed as it was fact. And sorry, I didn’t mean to sound aggressive if it came out that way.
I haven’t watched that video, but Mu has never existed. It was a thought experiment theorised by some victorian antiquarian and has no tangible evidence associated with it
I don’t mean to start a discussion here, but this is your interpretation and it’s valid. But galadriel’s character has contradictory history depending on your sources (even regarding the kinslaying). And it’s debated even between Tolkien’s scholars the extend at which she can ‘sense evil’. After all, she herself was deceived by saruman after his corruption during the third age.
In your last paragraph you say ‘nothing about her character in the series has any respect for Tolkien’s work’. That’s simply hyperbole, and arguably not true, as even a surface level reading can prove otherwise. Such words are not Tolkien’s way.
Anyway, I don’t want you to change your mind, just want you to be aware of the possibility of other interpretations. Take care!
Do let me know what you think of it!
It’s always the classic not-rule to take-away-your-children slippery slope, they always warned us of that in school