More and more people are using speech to text. And it does show how differently people speak than write (apparently I never say my be in because, for example).
But it also means that llms aren’t only being fed text, but also speech converted into text.
As well as revealing epigenetics. Which killed the nature/nurture shit.
Fucked up is a matter of perspective. If you’re an oligarch, it’s all going according to plan.
Yeah I know. But I wanted to point out that the comment in the article wasn’t so much a real consideration as business risk analysis 101. Along with a healthy dose of corporate spin.
A spokeswoman for OpenAI declined to comment beyond pointing BI to a corporate blogpost from May, in which the company says it takes web crawler permissions “into account each time we train a new model.
The translation for this is do we stand to profit more than we stand to be punished.
Basic capitalist risk assessment in other words.
I imagine some people already are.
I thought the main issue was that AI don’t really know how to say I don’t know or second guess themselves, as it would take a lot more robust architecture with multiple feedback loops. Like a brain.
Anyway, LLM’s aren’t the only AI that do this. So them being trained on Facebook data certainly isn’t the whole issue.
It’s not posting is the point.
Android phones back all photos up onto the Google cloud by default. Not everyone knows to turn this off.
Even funnier if Google also partners with a competitor, and Elon’s employees have to go back to flip phones
We have a refrigerator from the '80s that runs like a champ.
Solved the energy problem by putting solar panels on the roof.
Hepatitis passes through the bowels.
Anyway, the idea and process is similar to using urine to water the garden.
https://www.aquaponiclynx.com/pee-ponics
If you don’t want to raise koi or eat fish, it’s a viable option for home gardens.
Pee is pee. So if you don’t want to raise fish, for example if you’re vegan, human pee can work.
That’s a way to look at it. As a person with C-PTSD it’s not something easily dealt with or healed from because society isn’t that skilled at helping with it, and my brain was shaped by constant bullying and abuse for the first 12 years of my life. Saying I need to ‘heal’ is like telling someone with ADHD they need to ‘heal’. PTSD, for me, is a form of ND. I can learn better coping mechanisms and my symptoms can be more manageable, especially with better self awareness. But there was never a baseline of not having PTSD to heal back too.
In other words, hypervigilance around toxic masculinity is wired deep into my amygdala, and that’s very difficult to change in a society that doesn’t have adequate tools or resources to help even typical PTSD. Maybe when MDMA treatment becomes available and affordable. I don’t really know the outcomes with it for child abuse.
Anyway, bringing it up out of context when someone mentions having a good relationship with their (in my case) father, isn’t a trauma response. It would be petty jealousy. And while I have plenty of jealousy of NT people, I agree that bringing up jealousy when other people are having a good time, especially in such a petty unhealthy way, is a dick move.
I guess that’s when I switch my laptop over to Linux. Which is back how it was before I switched it to Windows for school.
My PC is already Linux.
If I had altered a primary source this little on a term paper I would get flagged for plagiarism.
The AI copy pasted down to the amount of cheese and then changed some words slightly to hide the theft.
It came from Reddit
Only less efficient.
That’s also happening, yes. But ChatGPT is also reproducing large chunks of training data verbatim.
This isn’t just about using ChatGPT to summarize articles or bypass paywalls. But also about copyright infringement (and no, reproducing large chunks of training data verbatim is not fair use).
People are naturally going to pay less attention the more cars drive for them. You can’t partially automate steering. Driver assisted steering is as close as it can be before the liability needs to fall on Tesla and other software manufacturers. A car isn’t a plane. The driver needs to be in control when split second decisions happen, like a child running after a ball.
If I’m paying for an autopilot, I’m not the pilot. I.e., the driver. The car is. And Tesla’s marketing bullshit and lawyers are going to fail here. This does not fall under puffery. It’s false advertising that’s causing consumers to place undue trust in a product. And the insurance industry is quite concerned just where the liability falls in all of this as well. And as they’re the ones currently having to pay out claims when Tesla wins, they have a vested interest seeing that Tesla doesn’t.
AI simulations are going to get used a lot for both revenge and black mail.
Corporations are inherently evil.