What’s what suppose to mean? Discounting his opinion because his username has the word Eskimo in it?
Just because something references race doesn’t mean it’s racist.
What’s what suppose to mean? Discounting his opinion because his username has the word Eskimo in it?
Just because something references race doesn’t mean it’s racist.
So it’s acceptable for AIs to generate these sorts of outputs, as long as they aren’t shared online? Sure, the outputs aren’t very tasteful, but they’re certainly not illegal by any stretch.
Why do you think the government should intervene, and what you would even expect them to do? No laws are being broken.
If you somehow forbid AIs from generating this through a national law just because it’s offensive, it’ll open to floodgates to ban 1,000 other things that are offensive. Where do you draw the line? Ban this content from websites like TikTok, sure. But it doesn’t make sense to regulate this from the AIs themselves.
So you would support government limiting an individual’s right to run software on their computer because you don’t agree with what the software outputs?
That’s absolute nonsense. The entire premise of these machine learning models is that they accept any arbitrary input, you would want to neuter that?
So they’re just desktop environment reskins? With sons basic config files changed? What’s the point? You can download some packages and files any time from normal Arch for the same outcome.
It is.
Believe it or not, it’s entirely possible to separate the artist from the art. Shocker, I know.
Whatever it is you think about him really doesn’t matter.
This is sadly how a lot of Computer Science students think nowadays.
Only the pregnant person and their doctor matter.
They avoided going to a hospital because they didn’t want the child, so they gave birth elsewhere. There was no doctor present to give medical advice.
The baby didn’t make it because of their negligence, so they burned and buried it.
How in the world could you defend something as gruesome as that? They’re monsters.
This feels like satire. There’s no way someone could actually write this without laughing at how absurd it is.
They won’t.
Calling other people’s work embarrassing is easy when you’re not the one building or contributing to the codebase. Implementing voice chat is no easy task, and it’s all done voluntarily in people’s free time.
The first album I heard from M83 was Dead Cities, Red Seas & Lost Ghosts, and it’s been my favorite ever since. Highly recommend playing that one front to back if you have the time, it’s an adventure.
Thanks for doing this!
Any advice would be appreciated.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Gq_Qiy2eAUGfDRSBVJqKUySlQ1qhkXna/view?usp=sharing
I took a few liberties in the skills section by putting the gRPC framework and REST under “Platforms”, I just wanted some place to put them. I will restructure it a bit since they don’t exactly fit there.
I don’t really like how users denote something as “dead content” in this game, because the arguments I’ve seen just boil down to efficiency.
People call activities that don’t provide top-rate EXP per hour, or magnificent rewards dead. A few examples of “dead content” come to mind:
I feel like this kind of efficiency mindset is skewing the trajectory of the game in a negative way. Jagex is being forced to have new content revolve around being “efficient”, and reward-centric, and that’s not how the Gower brothers intended RuneScape to be when they made it.
What happened to just playing things for the sake of fun? Dead content is only dead if you think it is.
Just my thoughts.
Well, I’m glad. I wouldn’t want to engage with someone as condescending and rude as you, either. The less people talk with you the better.