You write it in vim and then copy paste it once you are done.
BTW, why do you need a markdown editor?
You write it in vim and then copy paste it once you are done.
BTW, why do you need a markdown editor?
None. I’m kind of surprised most people don’t use lemmy the same way as reddit, I assume nobody just browsed /r/all?
The most important thing is that the codebase can grow without too much refactoring. Then you know you got the overarching design right. The rest then doesn’t really matter that much. You can always rewrite certain parts when/if needed.
A good way to do this is by making the core really solid, this is called bottom up programming: https://paulgraham.com/progbot.html
Cataclysm: Dark Days Ahead
It’s a time machine that teleports you to 3am the next day.
Sanmill
Basically nine man’s morris, it’s pretty fun trying to beat progressively harder AI. Each difficulty requires a different (better) strategy. It’s like unlocking levels in a puzzle game.
Haha, this made my day :)
Play chess.
A whale swallowing the world.
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
Just buy a new SSD to install Linux on. If you decide to switch back just plug the old one in.
I quite enjoy Nix flakes for this. Only certain languages have good support though (C, Rust, Haskell, OCaml, …).
Linux is already better than Windows, the latest versions are a mess, and is likely going to get worse.
deleted by creator
You don’t even need soil, you can just put them on the ground and cover them with hay, and they grow just fine.
Yes, I meant a bouillon or stock cube, sorry for the typo. Or you can use stock or a broth instead of water.
Stock is also pretty easy to make. You can buy a whole chicken and then throw the leftover carcass, skins, bones, with onions, carrots, celery and some herbs into a pot and simmer it for 2 hours.
You can also saute an onion before adding the rice and water, and add a bullion cube, to improve the flavor.
The way you can think of it is that in OCaml everything is implicitly wrapped in an IO monad. In Haskell the IO monad is explicit, so if a function returns something in IO you know it can perform input and output, in OCaml there is no way to tell just from the types. That means that in Haskell the code naturally stratifies into a part that does input and output and a pure core. In OCaml you can do the same thing, however it needs to be a conscious design decision.
The implementations mostly don’t matter. The only thing that you need to get right are the interfaces.
XKB config files work under sway without XWayland.
When does the narwhal bacon?