That wouldn’t be required for the person’s statement to be true.
That wouldn’t be required for the person’s statement to be true.
This has been my experience too. A random party w/ friends that rages until the next morning after 2 months of silence? Sorry, didn’t mean to be that loud. We’ll keep it down next time, let you know in advance, & even extend an invite. An every 3rd day blasting of music at whatever hour? Fuck you, I pay rent, I don’t care if it bothers you.
I continue to wonder if this is a bug or a feature. With each passing example it seems more & more like the latter?
But also, & more likely as suggested above, a Norm MacDonald joke. See here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ljaP2etvDc4
Now make it legal to remove all profiteering by criminal organizations & you’ve got yourself a winning combination.
I mean, if said item makes it to the banana consumer then I’m OK w/ the plan.
1 of those things you wonder how someone figured out before any other human. An evolution of knowledge, I know, but still impressive. Thanks for the content!
You can’t always wait for something to be great to join. Most FOSS products would die w/ that mentality. The larger the userbase, the more motivation to develop. Join, comment, engage, & help to build the best product. Or don’t, up to you, but the community would love if you did.
The rhetorical question of the century.
You’ve hit the nail on the head! States rights only apply to (insert conservative ideology here). It’ll be interesting to see if book banning continues to be allowed as it’s the perfect example of a law that shouldn’t be legal.
This is why religion is indoctrinated. While I can accept, even while not believing, the argument that spirituality is innate, organized religion is entirely a human construct.
Just the Internet, huh? I think it’s ruining a few things. Especially when it’s coupled w/ the forever growth mentality.
Ah yes…the ever popular trend of chasing positive financial results, no matter how temporary, at the cost of everything else even if ‘everything’ includes negative financial results in the long term. Brilliant!
Not only is this showerthoughts, as you pointed out, but the person posting never provided numbers for those that were previously aware of crowdstrike. Any attempt to do so by those responding takes the statement beyond it’s intention.