1. I have snapshots included as well.
2. Bugs found even in Testing and Stable can be prevented from entering Manjaro repos!

I stand by my point that the update strategy is a feature. You might not understand this, but my experience speaks for itself!

I’m on Manjaro, so I think it’ll be included shortly after it’s released :(

I totally agree. I have mad respect for Linus for the work he’s done and the immense amount of retardation he’s had to sift and fight his way through.

I have very little respect for the people critiquing his behavior while contributing nothing of value themselves.

Not really looking forward to KDE6.

KDE5 is great and does everything I need it to. I feel like upgrading is just going to introduce issues while bringing nothing new to the table.

The only thing I would like to change are bigger scrollbars or have the ability to easily resize them. Something tells me this isn’t going to be included in KDE6, though.

Client-side anti-cheat has always been a scam to offload server processing onto client machines.

This results in worse cheat detection and wastes client resources, but companies like EA can spend less on servers.

I keep hearing this but haven’t tried it myself.

Okay, I’ll keep waiting for the day that never comes.

This is the truth. I’m glad more people are starting to realize it.

None of the complaints people have about Manjaro affect me.

Been using Manjaro exclusively for 3 years.

That stuff is negligible compared to Mint getting hacked and hosting a malicious ISO.

But for some reason you never hear people mention that about Mint 🤷

I just wanna point out, people were using this exact same rhetoric when Antergos was a thing.

Antergos is no longer a thing. Just saying. Manjaro still is though! I believe it’s older than endeavor OS.

there is zero need to test outside of them.

Then how do you explain Arch users have to deal with breakages Manjaro users do not because the Manjaro team doesn’t push updates as quickly?

Yeah. Notice how he doesn’t mention how Manjaro holding back packages can actually prevent breakage that Arch users have to deal with.

The manjaro hate-boner is just tribalism and elitism. Every one of these threads reinforces that.

This, if your use the AUR with Manjaro, your system will break.

Been using Manjaro with the AUR for 3 years, never had the breakage you described.

Been using it exclusively for 3 years, never had breakage.

It’s not all “purists” and “tribalism”

I disagree.

Don’t listen to people like this.

Installing arch is a pain in the ass and the vast majority of people should not go through with it. If you like to tinker, go with arch. If you want a machine that just works out of the box, go with Manjaro.

If you don’t believe me, see for yourself. Don’t just believe people on the internet at face-value. Most of them are just regurgitating things they don’t understand in order to fit in.

Why “risk” it?

People were saying this back when it was Antergos vs. Manjaro. You know what? I used Antergos and it shut the fuck down. Manjaro is still going strong. I’m still using Manjaro.

I think the bigger risk would be to use endeavor os, even if more people like to shill it (like you predictably did.)

But experience speaks for itself. Who cares what a bunch of losers on the internet say if your experience is different?

Manjaro is the best.

The longer you spend in these internet communities, the more you’ll realize there’s a substantial amount of losers who can’t form their own opinions. They’ll just repeat whatever is popular in order to fit in.

Less is more. I feel we’ve forgotten that so worthless designers can justify their useless existences.