• 5 Posts
  • 68 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 21st, 2023

help-circle












  • drkt@feddit.dktoMemes@lemmy.mlEVs
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    No one says you have to stop driving your car while the city is undergoing restructuring. I am saying that allowing politicians to call electric cars a win will only entrench car culture even more. You have a strange “one or the other” mentality about this.

    We have had every piece of technology required to solve climate chance and make cities human-centric for decades. More technology won’t change anything. A fundamental restructuring of our economic model would. Electric cars do not help us toward that goal. Electric cars allow politicians to virtue signal about how green they are, while signing free trade deals that undermine the progress being made behind your back.


  • drkt@feddit.dktoMemes@lemmy.mlEVs
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    couldn’t walk or bike to where they work or get groceries, much less everything else.

    An electric car will kick this proverbial can down the road and make the bandaid even more painful to peel off because while you think you’re doing your part for the world there are 500 politicians who are using that time you’ve given them to eradicate progress toward a better city design.

    This is unfortunately the kind of problem where you have to suffer to solve it. If you can’t or won’t do that, that’s fine. I’m not gonna tell you how to live your life, I’m just telling you how this has historically played out over the last 3 decades. Capitalist innovation will not solve that capitalism is exploitative and wasteful.


  • drkt@feddit.dktoMemes@lemmy.mlEVs
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Are you telling me that I, who have never owned a car in my life, are unable to leave my house? Just because you got used to your car doesn’t mean it’s the only method of transportation. If it is the only method of transportation where you live, then, and I am sorry this is the case, but you could advocate for something better instead of giving up and accepting status quo.

    I am advocating specifically for the removal of policy that hinder the progress of alternative transportation. Electric cars would be fine if it was not for the fact that they are part of the policies that postpone or, in most cases, shut down alternative transportation. The inevitably city-redesign can is kicked down the road, becoming increasingly expensive as the years tack on. The best time to do something about this was 30 years ago.

    Electric cars will not save the planet. Electric cars will save the car industry.


  • drkt@feddit.dktoMemes@lemmy.mlEVs
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think we should encourage them as a transitional solution till we have trains and walkable or bikeable cities.

    This is my problem. I don’t think we’ll ever reach that point when we accept half-solutions. It wouldn’t take more than a single decade to uproot our city design if we had any ambition left, but alas.

    Our disagreement is that I think the societal cost of cars is more than you think, not that I think electric cars are a bad transitional step. But I also think that we live under an economic model that will kick, fight and scream the whole time we try to uproot such a massive portion of it, being the oil industry. It’s possible we just can’t fix it at this point except by radical change. I don’t have ultimate solutions, I’m just wary of electric cars because lithium mining is just as bad as oil drilling from a different direction and electric cars will kill just as many kids in the street as combustion cars.

    By all means make electric vehicles- just please not cars.


  • drkt@feddit.dktoMemes@lemmy.mlEVs
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Designing a city to be hostile to cars takes more vehicles off the road than trying to push people into electrics. Less cars (of any type) in the city means less health hazards means billions saved means billions to use on climate change research. Please don’t forget that tires are the major polluting factor right now, not exhaust gasses. I strongly believe this is more effective than trying to slowly push people into electrics which will still pollute the air with microplastics and make a ton of noise when they race through the city. Lithium is also not particularly clean to mine, so I’d prefer it was used to make batteries for bikes and other similarly sized vehicles. The world does not have the mining and processing capacity to support converting everyone to an electric car.




  • I cannot answer regarding VPNs as I live in a country where VPNs are irrelevant for torrenting, but I can answer the port question-

    If you don’t have an open port for torrenting, you can only connect to other clients who do have an open port. If you have an open port, you can connect to all other clients. Either client in a P2P setting will need an open port to communicate. If neither have an open port, they cannot communicate.

    It is beneficial to be able to open a port for torrenting, but keep in mind that you are essentially broadcasting your intentions with an open port (unless you use a VPN). If you live in a country where ISPs can hand over data to anyone who asks, they will use your open port against you. (unless you use a VPN).