Because reproduction is a lot easier than education
✨ 👋 Dutch queer person (he/they) | I like taking to people online
Because reproduction is a lot easier than education
I used to play tanks and snake
I had that one too!! And loved it
Not telling you how to live your life but if I may offer a different perspective: tomatoes can be very flavourful but the ones you buy at supermarkets won’t be. Your stance might simply be due to not having had good tomatoes? (which is fine in its own right but I will not stand for tomato slander)
Jerboa is fine for me, I’ve been using it for about 2 weeks now. Last update also added a bunch of new functionality which is awesome. It’s still in alpha but seems to be on track to become a great app.
I read the article yes
Yup it’s a common sentiment since the GPT era. Trash in = trash out still applies and we should be focusing our efforts on collecting quality data. Unfortunately that’s not what funders are interested in. Grants generally just go to people who promise better metrics.
By now, most of us have heard about the survey that asked AI researchers and developers to estimate the probability that advanced AI systems will cause “human extinction or similarly permanent and severe disempowerment of the human species”. Chillingly, the median response was that there was a 10% chance.
How does one rationalize going to work and pushing out tools that carry such existential risks? Often, the reason given is that these systems also carry huge potential upsides – except that these upsides are, for the most part, hallucinatory.
Ummm how about the obvious answer: most AI researchers won’t think they’re the ones working on tools that carry existential risks? Good luck overthrowing human governance using ChatGPT.
The thing is - and what’s also annoying me about the article - AI experts and computational linguistics know this. It’s just the laypeople that end up using (or promoting) these tools now that they’re public that don’t know what they’re talking about and project intelligence onto AI that isn’t there. The real hallucination problem isn’t with deep learning, it’s with the users.
How many do you keep? Did you teach them any tricks? What are their names?
This is actually something I was working on at my last job: Using speech recognition to capture oral reading errors and give feedback to children. It’s not a large field but definitely one of the more noble AI applications. One of the major downsides is that because of privacy concerns you will want to run models locally instead of simply accessing 3rd party (OpenAI/Meta) models through an API, which introduces performance limits.
Here he is!!! This is Fred and he’s a little explorer :) his one bad eye means he barely has depth perception so he always thinks he can grab birds flying over 😂
Omg thank you!!!
I wish I could upload my adorable little guy here who loves to go on walks in his harness but both browser and jerboa aren’t allowing me to upload pictures anymore :(
You have to accommodate them to it. Mine also just flopped down on the ground when I first put him in it, but now he goes on full walks with us. Baby steps :)
Umami!!! 🫛
I love Basil 🥰
Actually one of the conclusions from both the Science and Nature articles were that they mostly fuel far right radicalisation, not so much polarisation (which implies both ends of the political spectrum). Which I guess means leftists are generally either more capable of spotting misinformation or less inclined to act on it.