Yeah.

The video author can enable a setting to analyze the comments. YouTube itself flags comments that it deems inappropriate. The author only chooses which videos to include this tweak and the level of strictness.

It is enabled by default.

Comments that may be spam, self-promotion, gibberish, and otherwise potentially inappropriate will automatically be held for review in YouTube Studio and will only be published if you approve them. If you want a higher level of protection for your channel, increasing strictness will increase the number of comments held for review.

Wow. Does anyone share software from “the russian hacker” Valdik outside the RUNet? That’s the first time I’ve seen it.

Agreed. I’m using the native Windows version, written in C#. The developer stopped updating it because he switched to a cross-platform version. I take his point, as not everyone has experience with the technologies that are available on all systems. Electron is the solution. However, even the older version has all the features I need and an awesome UI/UX!

I would recommend Sayonara Player for Linux. It’s not as awesome as Dopamine, but I still love it. I couldn’t find anything better for Linux!

[Edit]

It’s already been shared.

Dopamine. The best player after some years of searching.

True. Popular books being read by millions of people have no reviews. That’s why I’m on the LibraryThing now.

Now it’s completely dependent on Bing’s results! I’d even say it does a worse job than Bing. I compared results for different queries and Bing was much better than Qwant! In fact, if you read their privacy policy, they sell your private data to anyone who asks for it.

100%!

I fell in love with Tenorite.

Oh, exactly! There’s a pinned post in the community that reports Lemmy version updates on the server.

Some do. E.g. lemmy.world.

For some instances, email can be filled and isn’t mandatory. E.g. beehaw.org.

Might be helpful to someone: flibusta.is, flibusta.site, flisland.net. Flibusta is the largest pirate library in Russian.

I had no problem with the previous two frontends (Piped, Invidious). But the main problem with this type of application is that when an enough number of users are reached, YouTube starts banning requests from their instances. Have the authors of this frontend thought about how they will solve this?

Wow, the first source is awesome! Didn’t know about it before, but now I will actively use it!