I think Steam does have enough influence to be able to pull a sizable chunk of users away from windows.

It seems like a very polarizing game, you either really enjoy it or not at all.

I love the division 1 and 2 but the first game had some MAJOR bullet soak issues for the first half-year of the game’s lifetime.

Massive always does good work despite Ubisoft, in my opinion.

Biggest issue I see is that these LLMs tend to repeat themselves after a surprisingly short number of times (unless they’re sufficiently bloated like ChatGPT).

If you ask any of the users of Sillytavern or RisuAI they’ll tell you that these things have a long tail of not being very creative.

Do you mean finetune data?

A model’s configuration data is training data.

What do you mean by “configuration data?”

I don’t think it’ll solve the problem. Ask anyone in the sillytavern subreddit and they’ll tell you LLMs tend to repeat the same dialogue a lot (look up the “shivers up/down their spine” meme)

Edit: since it might not be obvious, here’s an example of people who use LLMs for character dialogue’s opinion on the content being produced: (Link Warning: reddit)

https://www.reddit.com/r/SillyTavernAI/comments/1div11q/sends_shivers_down_your_fuing_spine/

Do image previews work over SSH? I admit I’ve never actually tried it…

I wouldn’t bother unless you find yourself doing more through the terminal than through GUIs.

I don’t have a built-in file browser (not using a DE, just i3 window manager), so I use ranger and pure GNU coreutils commands mostly but I still find myself missing the drag-and-drop features that FreeDesktop integration provides for stuff like nautilus.

The problem is that the Linux kernel is monolithic so introducing rust into it does have certain repercussions about downstream compatibility between modules.

Right now the rust code in the kernel uses c bindings for some things and there’s a not-insignificant portion of C developers who both refuse to use rust and refuse to take responsibility if the code they write breaks something in the rust bindings.

If it was pure C there would be no excuse as the standard for Linux development is that you don’t break downstream, but the current zeitgeist is that Rust being a different language means that the current C developers have no responsibility if their code refactoring now breaks the rust code.

It’s a frankly ridiculous stance to take, considering the long history of Linux being very strict on not breaking downstream code.

Well part of what it does is grab your actual desktop background to use, and there’s a couple different ways to do that on Linux afaik

Also I guess the file dialogs would open only to the wine prefix? My experience with wine applications and dialogs is mostly through bottles, so I’m not sure of the sandboxing…

I think it does that for some parts, but it does close the game out and open up folders for some spooks

It’s a game that messed with the windows on your desktop and opens file dialogs and stuff (as part of the spooks)

It makes me wonder how it works on the Linux side

> Kinito Pet now playable

How the fuck is that gonna work

I don’t know if thinking that training data isn’t going to be more and more poisoned by unsupervised training data from this point on counts as “in practice”

The key is to get one where you can widen the spray and squeegee everything off.

I like using it like a rubber ducky. I even have it respond almost entirely in quacks.

Note: it’s a local model running for free. Don’t pay anyone for this slop.

“When asked about buggy AI, a common refrain is ‘it is not my code,’ meaning they feel less accountable because they didn’t write it.”

That’s… That’s so fucking cool…

Main issue is drivers. One of the best places to take advantage of rust’s memory safety is in hardware drivers, and those would be hard to share between separate kernels.

That entire talk, and the complaint that Ts’o responded to was that to continue with rust, there needs to be some responsibility from the guys working on the underlying C bindings to not break downstream dependencies if they refactor code.

The answer from some of the Kernel developers, and vocally by Ts’o was: lol no fuck you and your toy language.

You said open source. Open source is a type of licensure.

The entire point of licensure is legal pedantry.

And as far as your metaphor is concerned, pre-trained models are closer to pre-compiled binaries, which are expressly not considered Open Source according to the OSD.