Why is the proposed solution always to just pay people more and not just make things cost less? The only reason I can find is that making things cost less doesn’t provide a scapegoat for everybody to rally behind, even though it would be more effective.

You’re the only one stopping you.

You’re charging somebody money to live in a space that you own? You’re an unethical horrible human being. You should have them live there for free and you need to eat all the cost of maintaining the building.

You’re overthinking it. You didn’t say anything insensitive or stupid. It will offend some people, but they are usually looking at how to be a victim and that gives them an opportunity. It’s just words, don’t worry about it so much.

Oh, I don’t. I’ll protect myself. Where I live the police are about fifteen minutes away. Ain’t nobody got time for that.

You don’t need a gun. Just call the police. They’ll take care of you.

No one is stopping you. Go for it!

What’s the threshold of income that would meet your criteria? Do you normally base jail time off of someone’s income, legally or illegally?

Now that sync works with lemmy, I pretty much forgot about reddit. I wish there were the same communities, but I figure it’s just a matter of time.

You are responsible for negotiating your compensation. You allow yourself to be paid peanuts.

Go ahead and explain the contradiction.

So you’re just trying to write the most incorrect statements in one reply? Since when did being born in the 80s mean boomer? You can go ahead and keep assuming, you seem to like being a dumbass.

But how would we have roads??

It is a sham. I agree with you, we shouldn’t be the world’s army. Israel, Ukraine. Way too much money and military weaponry given away.

I see you know all the buzzwords. That just might even be a record!

Am I missing something? I’ve opened the lid multiple times while the washer was going. All that happens is the water shuts off until you close the lid again. Never seen a washer that locks actually.