Can’t read Forbes b/c of ad blocker.
Is it the fine or the redaction?
That and ME is a huge dip in that curve.
I’m on board with your Vista–>7 thoughts, but I do take issue with ME. It never was a decent OS and it very much was a steaming shitpile. It was far too much new code stupidly rushed for the holiday season. I remembering installing it being a roll of the dice even with the same hardware. It would work, then it wouldn’t, then it might work with some odd issues, then it deffo would not at all. Hours wasted trying.
I really did try, but never had a good experience with WinME and I know of no one else who did. Even first Vista was better (though saying that makes me shudder).
I had someone hijack my account last year, Like a dummy, I had failed to setup 2FA. I caught it in the morning after they worked it most of the wee hours. Phone and email had been changed. I contacted PP and to my surprise they were effective in righting everything. By the end of the day, it was corrected. I was absolutely shocked they were so helpful, but I guess it can happen. So, maybe try again?
Not sure how all that can be separated out meaningfully as it is the platform being used and advertisers have expectations based on whatever agreement has been struck between them. Maybe I misunderstood. Perhaps the difference in your example is a user acting versus a bot? Intent probably comes up somewhere as well, but I am not a lawologist. 🤷♂️
My understanding is that the contractual agreement with advertisers is that they pay to reach ears. The ads did not reach any ears as promised which could be equated to fraud.
Yes. Especially the monkey. It looked so cool I use that one as an avatar in some games.
Reminds me of the anti-smoking campaign using animals. They did look cooler.
Hi Steve. Have you heard from Tom? Been a while.
Just freeze your credit. It is the simplest and easiest solution. It sucks, but it seems to be the best utensil to eat the shit sandwich we’ve been fed.
I do not have any of it. The corner it is in is dark as well.
I would say the face on my sculpture is more revealed. The squirrely mass starts at the hairline. There is also no sinister smile, but a blank countenance. As mentioned, it is only similar. I would imagine we’ve had many artists do renditions of this drawing. Long ago I’ve even sketched feeble versions of the same idea.
A conundrum that will haunt me all of my days.
The things you own end up owning you. - T. Durden
I possess a sculpture eerily similar to this drawing. It was made 40yrs ago by a Japanese artist I knew.
I’m inclined to agree, but would not argue against having one day a week where it might be permitted.
Edit: To those that might disagree: I believe it is more important to grow the community at this stage rather than focus on purely posting images. If there are those here who wish to read and learn about art, we should accommodate as many as we can. One day a week would accomplish this, IMO.
I have heard they (South Korea) plan on building skyscrapers with screens covering the buildings, so that they can project the background skyline via the screens. The effect would be to render the building almost invisible. Seems like a lofty goal, so I am not sure if they are still pursuing that project or not.
[deleted]
Ill-tempered?
[deleted]
Looks like some types can help with hard water too
https://plumbingnav.com/water-heaters/anode-rod-by-water-type/