That’s true, I’m just not sure how it’s applicable to the current conversation? I don’t think anyone is making the argument that open source projects are easy?
It’s more like realizing that you’re surrounded by fire, so you might as well pick a patch with a nice view.
They’re definitely different, just found it ironic.
Open Source means I can take the code and deploy my own instance without permission from anyone.
Deleting your account doesn’t impact all the content you generated, meaning Reddit can still profit off of it.
It was mostly tongue-in-cheek; The implication being that the right would somehow try to spin Joe Biden not misusing his power to benefit his family as a negative, since we know any GOP frontrunner would have immediately quashed this for their own family.
“Joe Biden has no loyalty to family, wants to destroy american family values”, something along those lines.
A drop in perceptions doesn’t matter if they keep electing him.
Good. Let’s stop playing this game of trying to save reddit. Nobody in charge of things at reddit cares. The objective is to make money so they can IPO. Nothing anyone can do will change that.
Best case scenario you continue generating value for a corporation that could not care less about you.
Literally as soon as the indictment was unsealed.
The same classified documents which he wants back because they belong to him and were illegally seized.
This feels like a pretty non-story. I can’t find it listed anywhere that anyone actually ordered food based off of what he said.
I do however find the rationalization amusing
“Trump defenders on Twitter noted the GOP frontrunner only said there’d be food for everyone at the restaurant — not that he was buying it.”
“No such thing as bad publicity” comes to mind.