Not in this specific age group. Overall men are overrepresented, not by 90% but they are, but less so in younger people
While I guess that’s true and it’s often surprising that the AfD is polling that well in the younger cohorts let’s not overstate their success. There are also a lot of people in that cohort very vehemently disagreeing with the AfD.
That is such a bullshit point. “The youth” doesn’t want one homogeneous thing. The youth is just as diverse in opinions as other cohorts, maybe even more so. It is also more likely to be on more radikal Sides of the political spectrum.
Valuing children only for the monetary value they will contribute is a very good way of producing unhappy children which in my view is pretty immoral. It’s also pretty close to viewing humans as capital and that’s problematic in it’s own right
Make sure it isn’t just the Pomeranians. Some Pomeranians are definitely going to be in the mix.
Covetous demon inspiration finally revealed
But the environment around you won’t be fine. Stray cats kill so many animals it’s actually a problem.
Servo exists
Yeah they were experimenting with 64bit exploitation when this signal handler got some focus regarding a (likely related) deadlock so they rushed to disclose their findings to the project to minimise the possibility of having eyes on this vulnerability
You just have a chain of unprovable assumptions there.
Kid’s use slang -> they must have picked it up on the internet -> many people are illiterate -> the parents of these specific kids are not raising them right
Excuse me the correct slang here would be to hit someone with that “hawk tuah”
I guess it’s also my bad. After reading the text with a more neutral mindset it’s not that clear cut as I initially read it. My bs detector tends to get a bit sensitive when AI comes up and I interpreted the wording in the worst way possible.
You know what I never had a picture of a silly goose in my head. But now I do. Thanks!
Well I hope she’s afraid of them now.
I’m gonna start following and bothering you!
Edit: huh boost for lemmy doesn’t seem to have a “follow this user” button. So you might be save for now.
You have written tests for your code and now feel safe because your code is tested. But test quality is really hard to measure. The idea seems to be to introduce “vulnerabilities” (whatever that means…) and see if your tests catch them. If they do that’s supposed to show that the tests are good and vice versa.
As the first AI-based mutation testing tool, Mutahunter surpasses traditional “dumb” AST-based methods. Our AI-driven approach provides a full contextual understanding of the entire codebase,
This is where I call bullshit. The AST is a precise representation of the code which should be easier to analyse and modify instead of the raw text. If you only rely on processing the text I have a hard time believing your AI has a deep understanding of the contextual interdependencies of the different parts of the code.
Edit: it kinda does use the AST if one of the preconditions is a treesitter grammar? Maybe the marketing wording is just very unfortunate?
No I didn’t miss that but taking an explorative pilot project as the defacto standard and then rejecting that it might be possible to build something more space efficient is not how the world works
Apply the ones in a star shape to distribute pressure evenly