• 0 Posts
  • 108 Comments
Joined 8 months ago
cake
Cake day: March 4th, 2024

help-circle

  • JovialMicrobial@lemm.eetomemes@lemmy.worldNNN
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    23 hours ago

    Oh wow… that’s way worse than I thought.

    Yet another ridiculous antiscience crusade preying on people’s insecurities and desire for easy answers and solutions.

    And there’s gotta be grifters pushing this bullshit and profiting off it via books, online classes or YouTube channels. There always are and they’re always really fucking weird.

    Anyway…Thanks for taking the time to explain! I really appreciate it!


  • JovialMicrobial@lemm.eetomemes@lemmy.worldNNN
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 day ago

    Hope you dont mind my random internet culture question…but whats the deal with the anti fapping guys? I dismissed the whole thing as meme and didn’t pay much attention and missed something.

    I thought prostate health and it’s relation to regular ejaculations was common medical knowledge so I’m confused as hell.



  • I wanted to find that article before I responded to you, but like I said it read about 10 years ago and not having much luck finding it.

    But yes wetnurses were available to all women because not all women can produce breast milk.

    If one poor woman’s baby is starving it was not uncommon for a friend or sister to fulfill that role to help them. Women were pregnant more frequently due to no birthcontrol. So a woman lactating was more common. However they weren’t hiring a wet nurse in the same way the wealthy were, and if a poor woman could feed her baby she would. A rich woman(almost) always hired a wet nurse regardless of her ability to produce milk.


  • I read once that it had more to do with not seeing wealthy women’s nipples. For example wealthy women would hire a wet nurse to breast feed their babies. It was a way to show off wealth and social standing. So the hired help in the form of a wet nurse could show her breasts, but her wealthy employer would not because its beneath her.

    So not showing breasts, even for the purpose of breast feeding became affiliated with wealth and power, whereas the inverse was true, showing breasts meant you could not afford to keep them covered.

    And that’s not even including the influence of brothels and prostitution.

    Let that cook for however many hundreds of years, mix in religion and you get whatever the fuck we have now.

    It was an interesting theory and seemed to make sense to me. I’ll have to try to find the article later. I read it maybe 10 years ago so it might take some looking.






  • I could be entirely fucking wrong here, but I’m pretty sure that actress played a mom in a netflix show about two brothers who killed their parents.

    It’s also 6 am and I just smoked a bowl, and it just occurred to me this might be a joke im not getting. If that’s the case sorry about that and don’t mind me




  • The DEA needs to be dismantled and have all those tax dollars put to better use.

    I take ADD drugs for a central nervous system disorder(they keep me awake) and my Dr is really worried about me not being able to get them since I can’t work without them. I know folks with ADD need them to function too(drs are prescribing my less used medication to replace adderall) so now everyone’s suffering because some douchbags in the DEA decided drs are the enemy.

    My drs office just got audited by the DEA so all her patients on stimulants and painkillers had to do urine drug tests.

    Sorry for the rant. But seriously, defund the DEA.


  • Or you’re in the right hand lane and people are still tailgating you even though you’re going 70mph.

    Some people are unnecessarily aggressive on the road. Probably because they have unresolved emotional issues and take it out on other drivers. At least that’s what I tell myself.


  • The problem is that ad revenue brings in more money than subscription models ever can. So they’re either super expensive because the company is accustomed to the high profits of ads, OR they inevitably end up slipping ads into the paids versions too.

    Youtube has become this venus fly trap where content creators get exploited. They exist on the site solely to draw in viewers to show ads to. YouTube doesn’t really care about the content or their creators(they don’t care about paying them either since there’s endless accounts) their primary function is to sell ads. That’s it.

    With data harvesting and personalized ads they basically print money for themselves. Now each ad spot will show something different to each person, meaning they are getting paid by multiple(potentially hundreds or thousands) of companies for each available ad location. They don’t care if you buy the product because they got paid the second that ad popped up on your screen.

    Ad based revenue is creating a huge fucking mess for everyone.



  • They know if they do that people will just disable their cameras or put tape over it like they already do. If they make it so you can’t disable the camera without losing functionality then people won’t buy the product.

    If they try to push it by making a gentleman’s agreement with their competitors to make all tvs or phones use camera eye contact during ads well have to have fight back with more ad blockers and such.


  • I don’t know, it was really super weird how randomly it started shoving them in my face when it didn’t previously.

    I don’t think Google gives a shit if I have kids, but the republican party has voiced concerns over “the domestic supply of babies” multiple times over the years and I wouldn’t put it past them to give google “gratuities” to shove baby related ads on people in general, not just me specifically.

    It’s just a hypothesis I have about the sudden increase in baby related stuff. I’m not dedicated to the idea or anything, but it honestly wouldn’t surprise me if that was the case.