Old doesn’t mean secure. Those old systems have had decades since the last security patch. Even then computer security was barely a consideration for the developers.
Please explain. I’ll make 🍿
Hello comrade
That’s weird, I get windchimes
Linux with no services? That’s not a usable system for anyone who would ask “do I need a firewall”
Systemd is a service that runs logind. What are you doing without them?
That’s a bad mentally as well. Most stacks these days are about quantity not quality. If you blindly hit 10000 targets it’s more profitable than trying to spear a single one.
Akin to not wearing a seatbelt because you are unlikely to be killed by a sniper
You shouldn’t trust your device. Modern software is insanely complicated, even netbsd had an rce.
No you aren’t, browser based malware puts the attacker inside your fancy network. A basic firewall will greatly hinder any attack at basically no cost to you.
There is no reason to not leverage a firewall. Plenty of browser based malware can breach your home router and call back out to allow an attacker to explore your network. Windows has included a firewall for over a decade and it’s fine. You can with a single command enable Linux’s built in firewall and be glad you did the bare minimum of cyber security.
Gnu is a dream, a thundering Hurd of dreams
Ahh capitalism…
Debian Hurd
Nope, it’s better then anything else here hands down.
Double checks for Hannah Montana Linux… Nope not listed… Yep it’s the best here
Does that predate or reference Dilbert?
It seems incredibly shortsighted to go this way. Sure 1 or 2 is fine, but when the whole os is snaps it’s abusing the system.
If they wanted their code to be sharealike, the developers could have chosen a different license. Apple is contributing more than is required so don’t complain?
Dosent this violate the gpl?
They can work on replacing that next