Don’t bring that here

No one believes that you actually believe any of that.

Black chain is dead. No one cares anymore

https://youtube.com/watch?v=vmRDcXADnbA

This is exactly the experience with me and my wife too. She was not at all impressed with any of the performances. And I don’t disagree I just don’t really care that much.

Though it’s not even close to as good as fury road. I described it as “fine”

I run arch and use the KDE beta package repo. Literally no problems. No idea what everyone is talking about here.

You don’t lose info as long as the offset is marked correctly

Logging in local time is fine as long as the offset is marked. Everything else I agree with you though

Also than*

TV weather people saying that the temp will be in the 80s is less useful to me than if they tell me if it will be 27°C for example

Well this isn’t really an accurate comparison. If they know an exact temperature, they would say it in both measurements. But they don’t. So “in the 80s” is the perfect range. Preparing for 80 degrees is almost identical to how you would prepare for 89 degrees. There’s no metric equivalent. The “20s” is way too big of a range. 20 vs 29 is a huge difference. Also, with it being base 10, you don’t really need more information. 80 is 80% hot. Think of the hottest weather you’ve been in. 80 degrees is about 80% of that. And before you say “I’ve been in 115 degree weather”. Yeah, so have I, I lived in arizona, and 115 is honestly not too much different than 100. After 100 it doesn’t matter much. Same with below 0. But the 0-100 range, each degree matters quite a bit

This. Fahrenheit is by far the better temperature scale for talking about environmental temps

Did you just not question my post or are you just intentionally not answering it?

What freedom do you have that you think this is infringing on?

You really don’t see the answer to this or are you just being intentionally ignorant. Would you feel the same way if the government banned lemmy?

This means, that there isn’t that much testing before the release. This can cause lots of problems for the end user.

Lol you’re buying into the FUD. ubuntu doesn’t test every possible combination of packages, nor do they test how updates actually impact the user. Generally updates are always good for users. They fix bugs. 99% of the time someone comes to a linux forum asking about an issue, the answer is “this was fixed in the latest kernel, try updating”. But because they’re using distros that use ancient, 3 year old kernels, they can’t.

Unless you have a staging computer where you stage your updates, you’re living in an illusion about “stability”, and using ancient tools with ancient bugs for no reason

Arch has an installer script now. It’s literally 1 command and you get a fully working system

I haven’t had an arch update break shit in almost a decade.

Steam is not in the AUR. Arch’s main repos have way more than Ubuntu and Debian. And then the aur is a better alternative to installing from source or doing other hacks

The arch wiki is the gold standard for Linux, not just arch. But it definitely talks specifically about arch.

So, there are built in install scripts now. There’s no GUI installer, but it’s 1 command to get a full arch setup installed with a desktop environment. Arch is a 100% reasonable choice for a new user.

I checked. You people are week. But anyway apparently it’s a crypto thing now. What a time to be alive

Untrained people shouldn’t be self-diagnosing based on hearing a list of symptom

This is literally what everyone does. How else would it possibly even work? “Oh shit you mean my foot numbness is a symptom of diabetes?”. Like, this is just how human interaction works.

And I don’t expect any one doctor to know of every treatment that exists for every illness, because that’s what collaborative knowledge bases are for. A carefully moderated medical Wikipedia that can be contributed to by doctors and researchers

What does this have to do with what we’re talking about. Are you saying that the doctor should just input every symptom that every patient gives them to a medical Wikipedia? Because otherwise how would they know of new drugs? They may think they know exactly how to treat whatever symptom, but if they’re not continually looking it up very single time, they’ll miss new meds.

But all of this wouldn’t make the pharmesutical companies as much money as peddling to hypochondriacs so instead we have ads.

What you described is not even remotely a solution to the actual problem of 1. people not knowing their symptoms are potentially from a disease that has a treatment. and 2. doctors knowing that treatment exists