I didn’t completely switch, koreader is installed side by side with the official software but it has a lot more feature and it suite my needs. Eg. I’m a developer and I wrote an Obsidian plugin to retrieve all my highlights and notes from koreader
I didn’t completely switch, koreader is installed side by side with the official software but it has a lot more feature and it suite my needs. Eg. I’m a developer and I wrote an Obsidian plugin to retrieve all my highlights and notes from koreader
On Android I like Moon+ Reader, on my Kobo I installed koreader
I’m an avid Obsidian user but I didn’t know about Matcha. It’s really cool
I want to jockely answer: curl
but there are seriously good cli rss readers out there:
If you want a way to self host git (not github) repositories you can check this list https://www.slant.co/topics/1440/~best-self-hosted-web-based-git-repository-managers
I don’t think it’s even possibile. How do you propose such a feature to works like? Showing all the comments from all the post known to your instance (so showing ALL the posts)?
It wasn’t meant to be a correction … I just learned about this project so I’d just want to know more
Are you sure about Paaster supporting Markdonw? I only see syntax highlighting https://paaster.io/GtlseaIIhqtfcsZV1C8sS#BgT9miwSaeKzMLQ-Ch6d3KZlgfCmIR32dpYr06HXYTw
I just copy&pasted their README in chatgpt asking for a comparison (so there may be allucinations)
Both PrivateBin and Paaster are “pastebin” tools that allow users to share snippets of text or code online. Both emphasize privacy and security, encrypting data at the local level in the user’s browser before sending it to the server. However, there are several key differences between the two services:
Design and User Interface: While PrivateBin self-identifies as a minimalist pastebin, Paaster seems to put an emphasis on user experience, offering features like file drag & drop and a paste history.
Features: Both offer basic features like password protection and the option to delete data after reading, but PrivateBin also offers features like the ability to have anonymous or nicknamed discussions, Markdown formatting support, code syntax highlighting, and the ability to upload files. On the other hand, Paaster offers a paste history feature, PWA support, and i18n.
Trust: PrivateBin warns users not to blindly trust the server administrator, whereas Paaster advises users to either host their service or use a trusted hosting service.
Implementation and Maintenance: Paaster seems more developer-oriented, with API documentation, a CLI tool, and support for Vercel and Docker. PrivateBin, however, also has a developer and installation guide.
Hosting Options: Paaster seems more geared towards self-hosting, with detailed instructions for use with Docker and options for use with external storage services like Amazon S3 and Google Cloud Storage. PrivateBin does not provide specific hosting details in the provided text.
Security: Both use end-to-end encryption, but they use different encryption algorithms. Paaster uses XChaCha20-Poly1305, while PrivateBin uses 256-bit AES in Galois Counter mode.
These are just some of the key differences between the two services. Both have their strengths and unique points, and the choice between the two will depend on the specific needs of the user or organization.
I’m incline to say that there’s no way. I order to have secure payments you have to secure each and every step of the process. Without a big corporation under those steps no one in his right mind will gamble with payments
Sometimes reality can be scary. This is the only reason I can think of about the downvotes they gave you
What a funny coincidence… I can’t comment on this very same post 😜
and, even if you scan them, how do you know that a port knocker isn’t there waiting to the secret knock?
the article say some bullshit … “platforms will be required to verify the ages of all minors” ok, fine … but wait … how can they do that??? Do they have to asks for every users worldwide their documents? And suspend any users that doesn’t prove he’s not a minor from one of those states?
I just use dockerized service and I plan to move to k8s so I don’t have (nor plan to) deal with anything besides dockerized services
Well, this way it works great for my needs … If I don’t need a service anymore I just remove its docker-compose and puff
it’s gone the service and the reverse proxy config all in one single atomic thanos-like snap of fingers
I wasn’t able to find a way to do the same with Caddy and I don’t get what do you mean with “moving parts”
It’s interesting how different people have different approaches … I migrate from Caddy to Traefik because I found it magical … Whenever I need to add another selfhosted service I just adapt a docker-compose like this one
version: '3.8'
services:
homeassistant:
container_name: homeassistant
image: ghcr.io/home-assistant/home-assistant:stable
#image: homeassistant/raspberrypi4-homeassistant:stable
volumes:
- ./media/:/media
- ./config/:/config
- /etc/localtime:/etc/localtime:ro
environment:
- TZ=${TZ}
restart: unless-stopped
networks:
- t2_proxy
- backend
labels:
- traefik.enable=true
- traefik.docker.network=t2_proxy
- traefik.http.routers.homeassistant.rule=Host(`home.mydomain.bla.bla`)
- traefik.http.routers.homeassistant.entrypoints=websecure
- traefik.http.routers.homeassistant.tls.certresolver=myresolver
- traefik.http.services.homeassistant.loadbalancer.server.port=8123
networks:
backend:
external: true
t2_proxy:
external: true
As you can see I just need to change the host and the port in the labels to have a new domain pointing to the right port … I wasn’t able to find an easier way to add a new service to caddy
having a redundant system is feasible (I’m just a dev, not an architect so don’t take my words for granted) but it have to be designed and putted together … and prices are gonna skyrocket
No. The “single source of truth” is the instance hosting the community. If it goes down the community itself goes down with the ship. The only way to prevent it is to have a IT infrastructure that can provide redundancy
In response to your question, I’d like to share my personal experience regarding remote work. I have been working entirely remotely for years, and given this background, I cannot imagine returning to an office setting, even if it was just for one day a month.
The primary reason is tied to time and quality of life. If my office were an hour away from my home - and in reality, it’s even further - I would be committing 8 hours a week just for commuting. This effectively means that in terms of hours, I’d still be tied to a five-day work commitment when considering the commute time.
But beyond the simple tally of hours, there are aspects of daily life and routine to consider. On the days I’d be expected to be in the office, I would have significantly less time to spend with my son. This would majorly impact our daily routine. We wouldn’t get the chance to have lunch together, and the management of daily commitments would become much more complex.
In conclusion, given my background and personal priorities, I would unquestionably choose to continue working from home five days a week rather than commuting to the office for four days. The flexibility and time saved from commuting hold invaluable worth to me.