• 50 Posts
  • 8 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 14th, 2023

help-circle





















  • Andreas@feddit.nutoTechnology@lemmy.ml100K Users - Revolt
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 year ago

    This project has a lot of red flags for long-term sustainability. It needs to be forked and maintained by someone who cares about open-source and decentralization, not being a Discord competitor.

    • The developers have no plans for financing the platform. In the FAQs, they claim that they managed to raise $2000 in donations, and that covers the costs for now, so they’ll think about financing “later”.
    • For whatever reason, they chose to develop not just the messaging client but the messaging protocol, voice, file and media servers. That creates a lot of work for the small team to maintain.
    • They don’t want to implement federation, partially because they would have to rewrite their entire backend, but also because…
    • They want to force people to use the revolt.chat instance. While Revolt can be self-hosted, the documentation actively discourages this and tries to obfuscate the self-hosting process as much as possible.
    • The open-source code is also several versions behind revolt.chat so that revolt.chat can keep an advantage over self-hosted instances.
    • The developers are university students who have never developed software professionally or managed a social media platform before.
    • Combine all of this with the lack of financing plans and you will have a service that is bound to implode or become enshittified when the operating costs and platform administration become too taxing.

    Revolt is a very impressive full-stack project for the developers’ experience level, but it’s not a good FLOSS Discord alternative.

    On another note, why are there so many children in the article’s comment section? Is that really the quality of the average Revolt user?



  • Archiving publicly available content is not illegal, otherwise sites like archive.org would have been taken down ages ago.

    Users are where the content is, and most people don’t have the energy to support a growing website that lacks content when another website that is full of content exists. Reddit’s advantage was that people only needed one account on one website to see content related to diverse interests. Mirroring Reddit content (while being transparent about the fact that the content is mirrored) can help the Threadiverse gain this advantage and make it easier to retain users who will eventually contribute to the Threadiverse.

    (In Reddit’s early days, it was full of Digg crossposts too.)

    The purpose of the bot is to make Reddit’s content accessible without being forced to use a corporate platform. The value Reddit has, in my opinion, is the wealth of knowledge that is stored there. The content is often stale, but most of us have experienced finding a solution to a problem from a years-old Reddit thread. If you used Reddit for social interactions, this bot is not the solution for you.

    Is the body of the post not appearing on certain apps or something? There is a summary that explains the bot’s purpose in the post body.