It’s been two months sir
[He/Him, Nosist, Touch typist, Enthusiast, Superuser impostorist, keen-eyed humorist, endeavourOS shillist, kotlin useist, wonderful bastard, professinal pedant miser]
Stuped person says stuped things, people boom
Maybe migrating to kbin.melroy.org
It’s been two months sir
have you tried plasma 6?
🤯
KIT Scenarist seems good to me, despite its creators ditching it for starc.
or filled with commercial and AI tools (Story Architect)
Why not just ignore these tools and use the free ones?
@pcouy Don’t confuse crypto with cryptography; I don’t see anything about cryptocurrencies here
SourceHut actually had a really nice UI! I’ll consider it. I currently don’t have problems with GitLab save for the UI learning curve (and their EE is source-available) but I’ll consider what you’ve said.
To be more concrete, we have to see if nearly all of the released games on the list have been subject to “abnormal review activity”, which steam automatically excludes from the percentage
It’s not just torrenting. Every user chooses what files they share, and these would be visible in search (and ranked by an internet speed transfer estimate), which makes discoverability a whole lot easier. If you want to download it, a direct transfer is initiated between that user and you computer only. You can also browse all files that a user has shared and chat with them about problems and whatnot (there also are chat rooms). Plus, since it’s not really torrenting apart from the concept, your download history isn’t targeted by popular tools that check out your activity on public trackers.
Dunno about you, but “Starknet” sounds like that comic arc where Iron Man gets a venomous suit and enshittifies life.
Why does nobody ever recommend GitLab
Soulseek
Only if you completely disregard the userland and impound the definition of Linux to the kernel base
Users don’t contribute builds. They contribute a specification file for how the build is made, which through the AUR is downloaded and executed. You can see the package source for every AUR package, and most AUR helpers make you look at the specification file by default.
New packages on flathub are moderated, though I haven’t encountered any problems from AUR’s moderation model either other than it sometimes being slow but harmful stuff is removed pretty fast
I think that’s a Manjarno problem.
Flatpaks are isolated while I want to use my input method. Plus, they have larger sizes which can pile up over time
The installation process has been pretty simple since archinstall and endeavourOS. The “sometimes” happens rarely, and the forums and mailing lists are pretty helpful.
The only times when an update broke a lot of stuff for me is 1. The infamous grub update which never happened again 2. Thunderbird dropped GTK support, not an Arch problem 3. I didn’t update for quite a while and had to do package replacements, which were automated by the package manager but was scary 4. Budgie and GNOME conflicted with each other. Weren’t very significant
CSON looks like a slightly worse version of YAML to me
You can buy a normal (or better yet, English-International) keyboard without the Windows key without confusing yourself with new layout conventions.
I think you’re confused. There is no warning letter, that’s just the takedown notice sent at the same time as the takedown.