For context: The thread was about why people hate Hexbear and Lemmygrad instances

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Do you really think when people say “eat the rich” they mean “eat farmers?”

    This is a ludicrous comparison. The top 1% of the world’s population causes the vast majority of problems. That is what people are talking about when they say “eat the rich.” Not millionaires, not even multimillionaires. Billionaires. People whose entire wealth was built on the exploitation of others.

    Getting rid of them will definitely not “get rid of the knowledge” because the only knowledge they have is how to buy the right financial advisors.

    Do you really think if Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates and Elon Musk all died today that the world would be worse off?

    • FrenLivesMatter@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Do you really think when people say “eat the rich” they mean “eat farmers?”

      No, I brought that up because that’s what historically happened. And in light of that, continuing to use a phrase like that at least seems to be somewhat poor in taste. But that’s besides the point.

      Do you really think if Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates and Elon Musk all died today that the world would be worse off?

      I honestly don’t know, but what makes you think the world would be better off if they were dead? Unless they had pledged all their money to charity (which I believe Gates has actually done), what would their deaths really change for you and I?

      Getting rid of them will definitely not “get rid of the knowledge” because the only knowledge they have is how to buy the right financial advisors.

      That might be true for people who inherited all of their wealth, but if that’s what you’re trying to say, you picked some piss poor examples, because all three of them weren’t born anywhere near as wealthy as they are now and took some considerable risks in order to get there, and they all created literally tens, if not hundreds of thousands of jobs in the process, most of them rather well paid (though we can certainly argue about Amazon).

      Just to be perfectly clear, I’m by no means saying that things are okay the way they are, and that all we have to do is let rich people continue to do whatever they want. All I’m saying is that things aren’t as simple as we want them to be and the easy solution is rarely the correct one.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        what makes you think the world would be better off if they were dead?

        They provide no value and pay almost no taxes. Without them hoarding their money, it would get circulated.

        All billionaires are money hoarders. They have more money than they can possibly spend in a single lifetime. And if you think their charities are truly benevolent, you should look into them a little deeper.

        Please, though, name a multibillionaire who is essential. Who the world will not be as good if they won’t be around. Just one. One billionaire that provides value to more than shareholders.