• snooggums@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      That is because weight is more accurate than volume.

      Volume was previously used because the measuring tools were cheaper and easier to use than a scale.

      • 𝕾𝖕𝖎𝖈𝖞 𝕿𝖚𝖓𝖆@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        It’s more accurate, it dirties fewer dishes, it’s easier to scale recipes for larger or smaller batches, and it’s much easier to fine tune portions. Plus, I make a very consistent coffee. I found something I like a lot, and I want it to be extremely repeatable.

      • no banana@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        I do, as a metric person, feel like doing things by volume is way more fun though. And I mean visual volume, no measurements. I’m radical like that.

        • Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          I feel that you are the type of person that is responsible for recipes with instructions like “knead until it feels right” or “make in the usual way” 😜

  • didnt_readit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    8 months ago

    Hold on, that’s not fair, we also use it to measure how much Coca Cola is in the bottle…hmm never mind that’s not helping… let me start over…we also use it for drugs! Wait, shit…

  • EchoCranium@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    I wish the US had made the switch to metric back in the 70’s. I remember having to learn it in grade school, and there seemed to be a push for it, but never went anywhere. I now work as a chemist where everything is done in metric, but then go back to US measures once I punch out for the day. Would be nice to have a single system instead.

  • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    Ελληνικά
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    You must think us Americans are just really stupid because we still use imperial, and violent because we’ll only modernize our units for weapons, but you’re wrong.

    We also use metric units for dispensing soda, and measuring engine displacement.

    So we’re fat and we’re obsessed with cars too!

  • gum_dragon@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    That’s not true. We also use it in medicine. To measure, in mm, our progress to universal healthcare.

    • AWistfulNihilist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Some of them we disguise the metric cause it’s anathema to us, 30 aught 6 for instance.

      Look at what we’ve done just to not have to refer to millimeters!

      • ikidd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        30-06 is a 30 cal bullet which should be 300 thou but is really 308 thousandths of an inch and is commonly designated a 7.62 mm NATO which it isn’t because that’s measured at the inside of the lands, so its actually 7.82mm.

        Simple.

        • w2tpmf@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          7.62 NATO isn’t the same thing as 30-06. 7.62 NATO refers to a specific cartridge, not the bullet projectile itself. It’s the same as .308 Winchester. 7.62x51mm.

          30-06 is 7.62x63mm

  • Kairos@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    The United States has been on the Metric system since the late 1800s like every other Western country.

      • The Snark Urge@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        It’s all metric behind the scenes. When you pump your gas it shows gallons, but it’s doing the math in litres. We turned our backs on the ⅓ lb burger, we’ve trained corporations to treat us like idiots.

  • alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Metric was too confusing for bullets, so we use both, and but neither of them are actually the diameter of the bullet, most of the time.

    .223" is the same diameter as 5.56mm (which is 5.7mm across), but if you use 5.56 in a 223, it might kill you.

    223 in 556 is fine, might fail to cycle.

      • alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        556 was the measure of the inner diameter of the rifling of a barrel of a gun that shot 556.

        Metric is confusing. That’s why for most shotguns, we measure the width by the number of lead spheres of that diameter that would equal one lb, eg a 12 gauge shotgun is the diameter of a 1/12lb sphere of lead.

        Nobody knows how big 18.53 mm is, but everyone knows what a 12 gauge shell looks like.

        Oh, and gun powder is measured in grains, maybe early smokeless pellets were about the same size as grains of wheat.