• cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    9 months ago

    IP bans are not very useful considering that almost nobody has a static IP these days.

    CGNAT IP addresses change frequently and can be shared by over 100 users. I find it very annoying to have to connect to a VPN until my IP changes because someone else got the IP I’m using banned.

    Browser fingerprinting would be a better way of detecting ban evaders.

    • haui@lemmy.giftedmc.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      They‘re useful for a very short amount of time and add frustration for the spammer but yes, the downsides are large as well.

      If a person knows how to change their ip after being banned, they probably dont use a normal browser either, dont you think? Or have I missed something about browser fingerprinting? You can post to lemmy over an api, right?