The mistake most devs make when trying to document their project is that they only make one (maybe two) types of documentation based on a readme template and/or what their mental model of a newcomer needs.

Devs need to be actively taught that:

  1. Good documentation isn’t one thing, it’s four. To have good documentation, you need all four distinct types of documentation.
  2. What the four types of documentation are (this is discussed in the link)

If you don’t have all four types of documentation, you have bad documentation.

  • torturedllama@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    The issue I see a lot in the JS ecosystem is laying out documentation like a reference guide, but then not including all parameters or functions. These types of documentation are very helpful if what you need to know is included, because they have nice friendly explanations and examples. But eventually you will run into a parameter that is mentioned on Stack Overflow, or is in a code snippet in the documentation, but then has no further explanation in the documentation, as if it doesn’t exist.

    Projects where the README is the only documentation seem to suffer from this problem the most. They give examples of the most common parameters and functions, and then that’s it.

    In JS this is a big issue because there may be no way to know a parameter even exists, or what values it accepts, unless it is documented.

    A lot of documentation in the Java ecosystem has huge auto-generated monstrosities with absolutely no explanations. In Java this is usually not useful because that information can be found in the types. But in JS it would be incredibly useful. Unfortunately it isn’t as easy to automatically generate that type of documentation for JS.

    Python in my experience has the best of both worlds. It has the friendly explanations and examples. But also has all of the parameters, even if explanations for some are a bit less detailed. And all of that is combined into a single place.

    • spartanatreyu@programming.devOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      The good thing about the JS ecosystem is that almost everything in the last few years is written in typescript.

      Just by typing in the name of the function and opening the first parenthesis, you’re getting type information right there.

      For example, typing:

      globalTestSetup(
      

      Presents a modal showing:

      globalTestSetup(options: { page: Page, slow?: boolean, locale?: string } );
      
      • torturedllama@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Mm indeed. Types to the rescue.

        Are there any projects/tools that turn the types into Java-style web html documentation? If you need to know something while you’re working on a non-typescript project that could be more convenient.